期刊文献+

实验室检验报告不正确率调查及质量持续改进 被引量:6

Investigation and continuous quality improvement for error rate in laboratory reports
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对实验室检验报告不正确率进行监测、分析,探讨如何降低实验室检验报告不正确率,以达到质量持续改进的目的。方法通过实验室信息管理系统(LIS)回顾性统计福建中医药大学附属人民医院检验科2019年的检验报告不正确率,对检验前、中、后阶段导致检验报告不正确的原因进行分类,针对导致错误的原因拟定标本采集培训、优化标本采集流程、设置LIS限制提醒、复核转录结果等整改措施。于2020年执行该措施,同时统计2020年每月各专业组的报告不正确率,对整改措施进行跟踪评价,并不断优化。结果2019年实验室报告不正确率为0.15%。错误原因主要分布在检验中阶段的返查后修改(48.54%)、检验后阶段的转录错误(30.20%)和检验前阶段的标本错误(7.80%)。2020年实验室报告不正确率为0.12%,与2019年报告不正确率差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=36.7,P<0.05)。与2019相比,除分子诊断专业组和临床血液专业组外,2020年其他各专业组的报告不正确率均有不同程度下降。结论实验室检验报告不正确率是一项重要的质量指标,对修改原因进行分类设置,结合LIS对其进行监测、统计、分析,可以有效的降低检验报告不正确率。 Objective To explore how to reduce the error rate of laboratory test reports and achieve continuous quality improvement based on monitoring and analyzing error rate of laboratory test reports.Methods By using the quality indicators management module in the laboratory information management system(LIS),the incorrect rate of laboratory report during the year of 2019 in the Department of Clincal Laboratory,People′s Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine was retrospectively analyzed.The causes leading to the incorrect laboratory report rate were classified according to preanalytical,during analytical and postanalytical stages.According to the causes of the errors,the revised measures were designed including specimen collection training,optimization of specimen collection process,setting up LIS restriction reminder and rechecking transcription results etc.which were implemented in the year of 2020.The incorrect rate of laboratory reports in each professional group during the year of 2020 was also statistically analyzed.The corrective measures were tracked,evaluated,and continuously optimized.Results The incorrect rate of laboratory reports in 2019 was 0.15%.The causes of error included the modification after rechecking during the test process(48.54%),transcriptional errors in the postphase of test process(30.20%),and specimen error prior the test process(7.80%).The incorrect rate of laboratory reports in 2020 was 0.12%,which was significantly lower than that in 2019(χ^(2)=36.7,P<0.05).Except the molecular diagnostic and clinical blood groups,the incorrect rate of other specialized groups in 2020 were all decreased with different degrees compared with that in 2019.Conclusion The error rate of laboratory test reports is an important quality index.The error rates of classification,modification,monitoring and statistical analysis for the causes according to LIS could be effectively reduced.
作者 刘继来 陈蓉艳 秦雪君 陈鹤鸣 林青 LIU Jilai;CHEN Rongyan;QIN Xuejun;CHEN Heming;LIN Qing(Department of Clincal Laboratory,People′s Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fuzhou 350004,Fujian,China)
出处 《临床检验杂志》 CAS 2022年第1期67-70,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
关键词 实验室信息管理系统 质量指标 检验报告不正确率 laboratory information management system quality indicators error rate of laboratory report
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1中华人民共和国卫生部.ws/T406-2012.临床血液学检验常规项目分析质量要求[S],2012. 被引量:2
  • 2Standardisations IOf. 15189, Medical laboratories-Requirements for quality and competence (3rd ed) [ S]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2012. 被引量:1
  • 3围家卫生计生委办公厅.国家卫生计生委办公厅关于印发麻醉等6个专业质控指标(2015年版)的通知[EB/OL].(2015—4—10)http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/yzygi/s3586/201504/7cfcbet)2f01745ef94alce57a4497f4c.shtml. 被引量:1
  • 4Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, et al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. ClinChem Lab Med, 2014, 52(7) : 951-958. 被引量:1
  • 5Sheppard C, Franks N, Nolte F, et al. Improving Quality of Patient Care in an Emergency Department:a laboratory prespective [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2008, 130(4) :573-577. 被引量:1
  • 6中华人民共和国卫生部.WS/T403.2012.临床生物化学检验常规项目分析质量指标[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.卫通[2012]23号. 被引量:1
  • 7中华人民共和国卫生部.WS/T415-2013.无室间质量评价时实验室检测评估方法[s].北京:中国标准出版社,2013. 被引量:1
  • 8Ric6 s C, Garcia-Victoria M, de la Fuente B. Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management[ J]. Clin Chem Lab Mcd, 2004,42 (6) : 578-582. 被引量:1
  • 9Kirchner MJ, Funes VA, Adzet CB, et al. Quality indicators and speeifieations for key processes in clinical laboratories: a preliminm7 experience. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2007,45 (5) :672- 677. 被引量:1
  • 10CAP. About Q-PROBES [ EB/OL ] ( 2014-4-28 ). http ://www. cap. org/apps/eap, portal? _ nfpb = true&cntvwrPth _ actionOverride = % 2Fportlets% 2FcontentViewer% 2Fshow& _ windowLabel = entvwrPtlt&cntvwrPth% 7BactionForm. eontentReferenee% 7 D = q_probes% 2Fqprobes_dese. html&_state = maximized& Da~eLabel = cntvwr. 被引量:1

共引文献101

同被引文献71

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部