期刊文献+

公共文化机构作为专业主体:负责任创新视域下政府购买公共文化服务的制度建设方向 被引量:15

Public Cultural Institutions as Professional Subjects:The Direction of System Construction for Government Purchase of Public Cultural Services under the Perspective of Responsible Innovation
原文传递
导出
摘要 为进一步健全完善政府购买公共文化服务制度,对28位主体的负责人和13个社区民众展开调查,梳理了购买主体、承接主体、专业主体和受益主体的不同立场和观点,并对各主体之间的博弈关系进行分析可以发现:把握公共文化机构在政府购买公共文化服务中的专业主体地位,发挥其天然的协调和引导作用,是打造政府购买公共文化服务良好生态系统的关键。在当下政府治理转型的过程中,政府购买公共文化服务无疑是重要的制度创新内容,而负责任创新的理论框架有助于我们更好地推动相应的制度建设。负责任创新要求考虑制度创新中涉及的多方面主体的需求与立场,力求在现有基础下协调各方利益,实现各主体的共同成长。 To further improve the system of government purchase of public cultural services, this study, investigates 28 heads of subjects and people in 13 communities, sorts out the different positions and opinions of purchasing subjects, undertaking subjects, professional subjects and beneficiary subjects, and analyzes the game relationship among the subjects. The authors point out that grasping the professional status of public cultural institutions in the government purchase of public cultural services and playing their natural coordinating and guiding roles are the keys to creating a good ecosystem for the government purchase of public cultural services. In the current process of government governance transformation, the government purchase of public cultural services is undoubtedly an important institutional innovation. It is reasonable and scientific to examine the relevant systems from the perspective of responsible innovation. Responsible innovation requires us to consider the needs and positions of various subjects involved in institutional innovation and strive to coordinate the interests of all parties on the existing basis,realize the common growth of all subjects.
作者 肖鹏 肖九 Xiao Peng;Xiao Jiu
出处 《图书馆建设》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期112-120,共9页 Library Development
基金 全国公共文化发展中心乡村公共服务研究院研究项目“城乡一体化进程中的公共文化服务:问题、案例与对策”的研究成果之一。
关键词 负责任创新 政府购买服务 公共文化服务 专业主体 公共文化机构 Responsible innovation Government purchase Public cultural service Professional subjcet Public cultural institution
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献166

  • 1C.胡比希,王国豫.技术伦理需要机制化[J].世界哲学,2005(4):78-82. 被引量:14
  • 2Adam, B. & Groves, C., 2011, "Futures Tended: Care and Future-oriented Responsibility", Bulletin of Science, Technol- ogy & Society, Vol.31, No. 1, pp. 17-27. 被引量:1
  • 3Astin, A. W., 2012,Assessment for Excellence : The Philos- ophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Educa- tion, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 被引量:1
  • 4Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C. & Guston, D. H., 2008, 38 Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnoiogy : Foresight, Engage- ment and Integration. 被引量:1
  • 5Beesley, L. G., 2003, "Science Policy in Changing Times : Are Governments Poised to Take Full Advantage of an Institution in Transition", Research Policy, Vol.32, No.8, pp. 1519~ 1531. 被引量:1
  • 6Blok, V., 2014, "Look Who's Talking: Responsible Inno-ration, the Paradox of Dialogue and the Voice of the Other in Communication and Negotiation Processes", Journal of Responsi- ble Innovation, Vol.1, No.2, pp.171-190. 被引量:1
  • 7Borm, P. J., Robbins, D., Haubold, S., Kuhlbusch, T., Fissan, H., Donaldson & Oberdorster, E., 2006, "The Potential Risks of Nanomaterials: A Review Carried out for ECETOC" , Particle and Fibre Toxicology, Vol.3, No. 11, pp. 1-35. 被引量:1
  • 8Braun, K., Moore, A., Herrmann, S. L. & K~nninger, S., 2010, "Science Governance and the Politics of Proper Talk:Gov- ernmental Bioethics as a New Technology of Reflexive Govern- ment", Economy and Society, Vol.39, No.4, pp.510-533. 被引量:1
  • 9Briggle, A., 2010, A Rich Bioethics, South Bend : Univer- sity of Notre Dame Press. 被引量:1
  • 10Brouwer, W., 1994, "Taking Responsibility for the Impli- cations of Science" , Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 14, No.4, pp.192~202. 被引量:1

共引文献596

同被引文献286

引证文献15

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部