摘要
在我国《行政诉讼法》的历次修改中行政行为主要证据不足的概念都一直存在,而无论是相关的法律法规,还是司法解释都未对该概念及其类型、行为定性、法律后果等作出解释。行政行为主要证据不足的概念具有范围、内容和时间等方面的特定性;其类型包括无主要证据、证据相互冲突、证据分布不合理、证据仅有部分证明力、证据非以法定程序收集等;主要证据不足的行政行为是消极行政行为、瑕疵行政行为、违法行政行为和侵权行政行为。因此,主要证据不足的行政行为将产生所设定的义务无效,所赋予的权利无效,所免除的责任无效和事实认定无效的法律后果。
The concept of the insufficiency of major evidence of administrative act has survived in the previous modifications of the Administrative Procedure Law of China, but there are no explanations made to the concept and its types, definition of the nature of the act, legal consequence by the relevant laws,regulations and judicial interpretations. In this author’s opinion that, the concept of the insufficiency of major evidence of administrative act has specificity of scope, content and time;the types of which include lack of major evidence, conflict of evidence, irrationality of the distribution of evidence, partial proof force, evidence collection out of legal procedure, and so on;the administrative act insufficient of major evidence is passive,illegal and tortious administrative act. Therefore, the administrative act insufficient of major evidence will produce legal consequences of void duty defined, invalid right entitled, void obligation exempted and invalid fact-finding.
出处
《上海政法学院学报（法治论丛）》
2022年第1期44-59,共16页
Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law(The Rule of Law Forum)
基金
2017年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“新时期改革与法治关系实证研究”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:17JZD004。
关键词
行政行为
证据
证据类型
行为定性
法律后果
Administrative Act
Evidence
Type of Evidence
Definition of the Nature of the Act
Legal Consequence
