摘要
我国《民法典》采用了隐私权与个人信息并立保护的“二元模式”,并将“私密信息”作为二元并立的交叉部分规定在第1034条第3款,形成了《民法典》私密信息与一般个人信息的划分。《民法典》中未对“私密信息”作出界定。“私密信息”的内涵为可直接或间接识别至特定自然人,且不愿为他人知晓的信息;同时“私密信息”应受到公共利益的限制。与《民法典》的分类不同,《个人信息保护法》采用的是敏感个人信息与一般个人信息的分类。但是,“敏感个人信息”不等于“私密信息”,二者之间是包含与被包含的关系。二者在内涵上存在重叠;信息主体对“私密信息”的控制程度远高于“敏感个人信息”;“敏感个人信息”的外延大于“私密信息”。
China’s civil code adopts the“dual model”of simultaneously protecting privacy rights and personal information,and stipulates“private information”as the cross part of dual coexistence in paragraph 3 of Article 1034,forming the division between private information and general personal information in the civil code.The civil code does not define“private information”.The connotation of“private information”refers to information that can be directly or indirectly identified to specific natural persons and does not want to be known by others;at the same time,“private information”should be limited by the public interest.Different from the classification of the civil code,the personal information protection law adopts the classification of sensitive personal information and general personal information.However,“sensitive personal information”is not equal to“private information”,and there is a relationship between them.They overlap in connotation;the information subject’s control over“private information”is much higher than“sensitive personal information”;the extension of“sensitive personal information”is greater than that of“private information”.
作者
徐晓月
Xu Xiaoyue(Law School East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处
《北京化工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第4期52-59,共8页
Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
私密信息
敏感个人信息
民法典
个人信息保护法
private information
sensitive personal information
civil code
personal information protection law
