摘要
围绕个人信息权的“权利”论证呈现出复杂面相,原因是对其法权结构的认知存在模糊性,需要进行个人信息权的内涵分析、逻辑梳理与体系建构。个人信息权源自宪法,具有主观权利和客观法的双重性质,表现为基本权利范畴的“个人信息受保护权”;延伸至私法领域,表现为个人信息权益。客观法中“权利”相关条款往往是作为工具而不是目的,应当区别于主观权利,并结合整体法秩序加以理解和适用。《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》第四章应当结合立法目的被解释为程序性权利条款,并限于个人信息处理活动与处理关系中适用,实现多方利益平衡;其中“知情权、决定权”的客观法条款存在解释空间,经过侵权法的冶炼后可以发展出新型权利。
The“rights”argument surrounding the right of personal information presents a complex aspect because of the ambiguity in the cognition of the structure of legal rights.The rights of personal information originate from the constitution and manifests as the“right to protect personal information”under the basic rights,which has the dual nature of subjective rights and objective law;when extends to the field of private law,it manifests itself as the rights of personal information.The relevant clauses of“rights”in objective law are often used as tools rather than ends which should be distinguished from subjective rights,and understood and applied in conjunction with the overall legal order.The fourth chapter of China’s Personal Information Protection Law should be interpreted as a procedural right clause in conjunction with legislative purposes,and should be limited to personal information processing activities and processing relations to achieve a balance of multi-party interests.There is room for the objective law clauses of“the right to know and the right to make decisions”to be further interpreted and,developed after the smelting of tort law.
作者
韩强
吴涛
HAN Qiang;WU Tao(Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处
《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2022年第1期34-44,共11页
Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics：Social Sciences edition Edition
关键词
个人信息权
主观权利
客观法
权利条款
处理活动
程序性权利
新型权利
personal information rights
subjective rights
objective law
rights clauses
processing activities
procedural rights
new rights
