期刊文献+

本体、认识与价值:智能教育的技术伦理风险隐忧与治理进路 被引量:20

Secret Worry and Governance Approach of Intelligent Educational Technology Ethics:Ontology, Epistemology and Axiology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人工智能技术引领的智能教育革命方兴未艾,各类智能教育新应用为教育发展增值赋能的同时也隐匿着巨大的伦理风险,不断侵蚀着人类教育几千年来所坚守的道德基础。研究从本体论、认识论、价值论三重哲学视角对智能教育的技术伦理问题进行本质还原,探寻智能教育伦理风险的原点逻辑和治理之道。从本体论出发,智能技术的本质是以符号世界替代真实世界,这会引发盲目的科学崇拜,只有保有对智能技术的理性与慎辨才能指向智能教育的澄明进路;从认识论出发,智能技术颠覆了主客二分的"人-技术"关系,奇点超越后混乱的人机关系将导致不可测的道德危机,只有在承认智能技术"类人"身份后赋予其道德观念和道德能力才能形塑智能教育的道德进路;从价值论出发,智能技术描绘了教育公平的美好愿景,但其深藏的技术偏向可能把教育带向更深层次的歧视和不公,只有依赖制度力量构建问责机制对智能技术应用予以监管,才能促进智能教育的福祉进路。 The revolution of intelligent education led by artificial intelligence technology is in the ascendant, all kinds of new applications of intelligent education not only add value and empower the development of education, but also hide huge ethical risks, which constantly erode the moral foundation of human education for thousands of years. From the perspective of ontology, epistemology and axiology, this paper studies the essence of technological ethics in intelligent education, and explores the origin logic and governance of ethical risks in intelligent education. Starting from the perspective of ontology, the essence of intelligent technology is to replace the real world with the symbolic world, which will lead to blind science worship, only by maintaining the rationality and careful discrimination of intelligent technology can we point to the clear path of intelligent education;starting from the perspective of epistemology, intelligent technology subverts the “human-technology” relationship between subject and object, and the chaotic human-technology relationship that occurs after the singularity is exceeded can lead to unpredictable moral crisis, only by recognizing the “human-analogy” identity of intelligent technology and endowing it with moral concepts and moral ability can we shape the moral approach of intelligent education;starting from the perspective of axiology, intelligent technology describes beautiful vision of educational equity, but its deep technology bias may lead education to a deeper level of discrimination and injustice, only by relying on institutional forces to build an accountability mechanism to supervise the application of intelligent technology can we promote the well-being of intelligent education.
作者 韦妙 何舟洋 WEI Miao;HE Zhouyang(Hubei University of Technology,Wuhan Hubei 430068)
出处 《现代远距离教育》 CSSCI 2022年第1期75-82,共8页 Modern Distance Education
基金 教育部人文社科研究项目“农村小规模学校信息化发展模式研究”(编号:15YJC880094)。
关键词 智能教育 技术伦理 本体论 认识论 价值论 Intelligent Education Technical Ethics Ontology Epistemology Axiology
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献157

同被引文献327

引证文献20

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部