摘要
认罪认罚从宽制度下的证据开示程序有利于保证犯罪嫌疑人、被告人认罪认罚的真实性、自愿性,保障辩方行使知悉权,体现检察官履行客观公正义务,推动侦查走向公开。但现行认罪认罚从宽制度下证据开示程序的性质、范围、时间、地点、监督与救济机制等方面存在不明或缺失。结合我国认罪认罚司法实践和域外有益经验,应当明确诉辩双方在认罪认罚案件中负有不同程度的相互开示义务,在认罪认罚功能区采用两阶段式开示,逐步推动双方开示范围扩大化,建立分主体分情况的开示不当惩罚与救济机制。
The evidence disclosure under the system of lenient punishment for guilty plea is conducive to ensuring the authenticity and voluntariness of the suspect and defendant’s confession and punishment,safeguarding the defense’s right to know,reflecting the prosecutor’s objective and fair obligation,and prompting the investigation to be open.But under the current system of leniency for a guilty plea,the nature,scope,time,place,supervision and relief mechanism of the evidence disclosure are unclear or missing.Based on the China’s judicial practice and foreign beneficial experience,we should make it clear that prosecutors and defendants have different degrees of mutual disclosure obligations in confession cases,adopt two-stage disclosure in the functional area of confession,gradually promote the expansion of both sides’disclosure scope,and establish the punishment and relief mechanism for improper disclosure by subject and situation.
作者
马腾江
MA Tengjiang(School of Law, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350108, China)
出处
《东莞理工学院学报》
2021年第6期67-75,共9页
Journal of Dongguan University of Technology
基金
国家社会科学基金规划项目“认罪认罚从宽案件中律师参与问题实证研究”(17BFX057)。
关键词
认罪认罚
配套程序
证据开示
检察机关
plead guilty
correlative procedure
evidence disclosure
procuratorate
