摘要
2019年《关于适用认罪认罚从宽制度的指导意见》第29条规定“人民检察院可以针对案件具体情况,探索证据开示制度,保障犯罪嫌疑人的知情权和认罪认罚的真实性及自愿性”。认罪认罚案件中进行的证据开示与一般的刑事证据开示相比在适用时点、设定目的、程序主导以及价值基础方面均存在特殊性,构建我国认罪认罚案件证据开示制度应当遵循不开示禁止出原则、证据开示对等原则和强制性开示原则。在我国当前被追诉人阅卷权在法律规定和实务中都没有被确立的背景下,审查起诉阶段的证据开示面临着障碍,需要改变被追诉人传统的双重角色。
In 2019,the Supreme People's Court,the Supreme People's Procuratorate,Ministry of Justice,Ministry of Public Security,Ministry of State Security released"Guidelines on the Application of the Confession and Punishment System",which stipulates that"the People's Procuratorate may explore the system of evidence-opening in the specific circumstances of the case,so as to guarantee the veracity and voluntary nature of the criminal suspect's right to know and the guilty plea and punishment".Compared with the general criminal evidence opening,there are special features in the application point,set purpose,procedure leading and value basis,and the construction of the evidence opening system in confessional and punishment cases in China should follow the principle of non-opening prohibition,the principle of re-equality of evidence opening and the principle of mandatory opening.Under the background that the right of the accused to read the papers in our country has not been established in the legal provisions and practice,the examination of the evidence opening in the prosecution stage is facing obstacles and the traditional dual role of the accused needs to be changed.
作者
朱安东
ZHU An-dong(Graduate School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200062)
出处
《牡丹江教育学院学报》
2020年第11期108-112,共5页
Journal of Mudanjiang College of Education
关键词
证据开示
价值基础
制度构建
障碍
evidence opening
value basis
system construction
obstacles
