摘要
我国传统刑事诉讼的理论与实践侧重于对人身权的保障,却偏废对财产权保护的理论观照。我国新设的职务犯罪类缺席审判程序对刑事诉讼的理念、原则与制度产生巨大冲击,具有“先天不足”的特性,而从刑事一体化的视野来看,职务犯罪类缺席审判程序与被追诉人的涉案财物“唇齿相依”。为了确保职务犯罪类缺席审判程序的实践生命力,推进国际刑事司法协助的有效开展,我国应当在职务犯罪类缺席审判中构建涉案财产处置的特殊机制,由法院探索性地运用司法审查原则,重新解读此类程序中被追诉人享有的“异议权”,并逐步推进“财政返还政策”向“资产分享机制”转变。
Either in theory or in practice,China’s traditional criminal procedure attaches more importance to the safeguarding of personal rights of individuals than to property rights.China has newly established the special procedure of criminal trials in absentia for duty-related crimes,primarily aiming at transnational capital recovery so that it is closely related to property rights of the accused.In addition,as for the international judicial assistance,the requested countries usually conduct the substantive review of the legitimacy of criminal trials in absentia.Hence,in order to make up for the congenital deficiency of criminal trial in absentia,protect the property rights of the accused,and push forward the transnational judicial assistance,China should construct a special mechanism regarding property involved in the system of criminal trials in absentia,adopt the principle of judicial review,and expand the ways for relief.Besides,the current“financial return mechanism”should be transformed into the“asset-sharing mechanism”in the system of criminal trials in absentia for breaking the interest chain of relevant authorities in judicial practice.
作者
杨帆
YANG Fan(Law School,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225127,China;Crime Issue Research Center,Peking University,100871 Beijing,China)
出处
《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期84-91,共8页
Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“刑事诉讼中的财产权保护系统研究”(18ZDA144)。
关键词
刑事缺席审判
涉案财物处置
强制性措施
资产分享机制
criminal trial in absentia
disposal of case-involving property
compulsory measures
asset-sharing mechanism
