摘要
民法上个人信息与隐私的界分,使得私密信息被驱逐于侵犯公民个人信息罪之外,只能以其他法益下的罪名进行间接保护。私密信息的间接保护模式有罪刑不匹配、应对迟缓、保护片面等适用困境,导致司法实践找法困难,甚至僭越罪刑法定原则,无法适应私密信息社会风险管控的现实需要。这一困境的根本解决方案是,顺应私密信息入刑的国际趋势,在个人信息刑民概念法域冲突中,采取相对说的立场,运用功能主义的刑法解释,将公民个人信息重新解释为私密信息和个人信息。这种解释不但有体系解释、历史解释等解释论上的支撑,也能通过冒犯原则、法律道德主义的刑罚正当性检验。
The distinction between personal information and privacy in the civil law makes private information expelled from the crime of infringing on citizens’personal information,and can only be protected indirectly by other crimes under the legal interests.The indirect protection model of private information has such dilemmas as mismatched crime and punishment,slow response,and one-sided protection,which makes it difficult to find the law in judicial practice,and even violates the principle of statutory crimes and punishments,and cannot meet the actual needs of risk management and control in a private information society.The solution is to comply with the international trend of criminalization of private information.In the conflict between the criminal and civil concepts of personal information,take a relative standpoint,use a functionalist interpretation of the criminal law,and redefine citizens’personal information as private information and personal information.This is not only supported by interpretive theories such as systematic interpretation and historical interpretation,but also can pass the criminal justice test of offending principles and legal moralism.
作者
王泰人
罗翔
Wang Tairen;Luo xiang(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100086)
出处
《警学研究》
2021年第5期55-68,F0002,共15页
Police Science Research
关键词
私密信息
个人信息
法域冲突
private information
personal information
conflict of jurisdiction
