期刊文献+

氟维司群治疗曾接受过芳香化酶抑制剂治疗的复发转移性乳腺癌的疗效观察 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究在曾接受过芳香化酶抑制剂治疗的复发转移性乳腺癌患者的临床治疗中应用氟维司群的疗效。方法37例曾接受过芳香化酶抑制剂治疗的复发转移性乳腺癌患者为观察对象,回顾性分析患者的相关临床资料,评估患者的疗效,分析无进展生存期(PFS)的影响因素,观察治疗安全性。结果37例患者的中位治疗时间为20周,中位PFS为3.7个月[95%CI=(0.85,7.51)]。首次评估时,37例患者均未出现完全缓解(CR),仅1例(2.70%)为部分缓解(PR),19例(51.35%)为稳定(SD),17例(45.95%)患者进展(PD)出现时间为初次评价疗效时。其中客观缓解率(ORR)为2.70%,疾病控制率(DCR)为54.05%,临床获益率(CBR)为43.24%。不同转移部位数量、既往化疗线数患者的PFS比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。转移部位数量越多、既往化疗线数越多的患者PFS越短。多因素分析显示,转移部位数量、既往化疗与否为PFS的独立影响因素(P<0.05)。结论在曾接受过芳香化酶抑制剂治疗的复发转移性乳腺癌患者的治疗中,应用氟维司群具有良好的临床疗效,且具有可靠的安全性。
作者 阎瑾
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2021年第18期175-177,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献41

  • 1CHEN W, ZHENG R, BAADE P D, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015 [ J ] . CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132. 被引量:1
  • 2CARDOSO F, COSTA A, NORTON L, et al. ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2) dagger [ J ] . Ann Oncol, 2014, 25(10): 1871-1888. 被引量:1
  • 3National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast cancer, V.2.2016. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/ PDF/breastcancer.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2016 [ EB/OL ] . 被引量:1
  • 4BASELGA J, CAMPONE M, PICCART M, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer [ J ] . N Engl J Med, 2012, 366(6): 520-529. 被引量:1
  • 5CHIA S, GRADISHAR W, MAURIAC L, et al. Double-blind, randomized placebo controlled trial of fulvestrant compared with exemestane after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor- positive, advanced breast cancer: results from EFECT [ J ] . J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(10): 1664-1670. 被引量:1
  • 6JOHNSTON S R, KILBURN L S, ELLIS P, et al. Fulvestrant plus anastrozole or placebo versus exemestane alone after progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (SoFEA): a composite, multicentre, phase 3 randomised trim [ J ] Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14(10): 989-998. 被引量:1
  • 7DI LEO A, JERUSALEM G, PETRUZELKA L, et al. Results of the CONFIRM phase m trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer [ J ] . J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(30): 4594-4600. 被引量:1
  • 8DI LEO A, JERUSALEM G, PETRUZELKA L, et al. Final overall survival: fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the randomized CONFIRM trial [ J ] . J Natl Cancer Inst, 2014,106(1): 337. 被引量:1
  • 9JIANG Z. A phase m study of fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg in postmenopausal Chinese women with advanced breast cancer and disease progression following failure on prior antiestrogen or aromatase inhibitor therapy: supporting superior clinical benefit for the 500 mg dose: The 2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2014 [ C ] . NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4,03. 被引量:1
  • 10Available from: URL:http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ ftpl/CTCAE/About.html. Accessed May, 17, 2010 [ EB/OL ] . 被引量:1

共引文献23

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部