摘要
《电子商务法》中的通知-删除条款在适用层面引发不少争议,这源于对该条款的属性认识不清。结合通知-删除规则在我国的演进历程与《民法典》第1195条的规定,应当确认《电子商务法》中通知-删除条款的归责属性。通知-删除条款的归责定性要求电商平台承担审查者而非信使的角色,进而影响通知-删除规则的具体适用。在归责语境下,通知中的初步证据应当被界定为使侵权行为明显的证明材料,必要措施的范围应具有开放性,何为"及时"应采取多因素考量法,平台需承担防止反复侵权的义务,平台因过错误删需承担侵权责任,15天"冷静期"应被解释为推定性规范。
Because of different understandings regarding the nature of notice-and-takedown clause in E-commerce Act,there exist many disputes on the application of this clause.By referring to the evolution of notice-and-takedown procedures in China and the Article 1195 of the Civil Code,the notice-and-takedown clause in E-commerce Act should be identified as an imputation clause.Therefore,e-commerce platforms should play a role of monitors rather than massagers,and this observation will further affect the application of notice-and-takedown procedure.In the context of being an imputation clause,it should be interpreted as follows:the“prima facie evidences”should be defined as the evidences which make infringements manifest;the“necessary measures”should be interpreted in an open-ended way;what constitutes“in a timely manner”should be decided by multi-factors assessment;platforms should undertake the obligation of preventing repeated infringement;platform should be liable for wrong takedowns at fault;the time-frame of 15 days should be interpreted as the norms to presume whether platforms are at fault.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2021年第5期182-194,共13页
Journal Of CUPL
基金
上海市哲学社会科学规划课题资助项目(2018EFX005)的阶段性成果。
关键词
电子商务法
通知-删除规则
归责条款
初步证据
必要措施
E-commerce Act
notice-and-takedown procedure
imputation clause
prima facie evidences
necessary measures
