摘要
在对资本主义生产过程的叙事中,马克思指认了自然对劳动过程的贡献,而自然要素本身却不形成价值。马克思这种叙事上的差异,让我们进一步从劳动二重性中体认到自然在资本主义生产中存在方式的二重性,从而彰显劳动价值论的生态意涵:一方面,从创造财富的角度看,在劳动过程中,自然的"自然形式"表现为以一种"无机的身体"的存在方式被生产者"天然占有",实现了自身与生产者的统一;但在价值形成、增殖过程中,自然的"社会形式"因资本主义私人占有而表现为同生产者相"分离",从而导致了自身被"剥削"的异化。另一方面,从促进财富增长的角度看,在劳动过程中,自然的"自然形式"表现为以一种"具体多样性"的存在方式促进财富的增长;但在价值形成、增殖过程中,自然的"社会形式"却表现为"单一抽象性"的"价值形式",从而导致了自身被"贬值"的异化。
In Marx’s narrative of the capitalist production process,he identifies the contribution of nature to the labor process,while the natural elements themselves do not form value. This difference in Marx’s narrative allows us to further realize the duality of the way nature exists in capitalist production from the perspective of the duality of labor,thus highlighting the ecological connotation of the labor theory of value. On the one hand,from the perspective of wealth creation,in the process of labor,the "natural form"of nature is expressed in the form of an "inorganic body"that is "naturally possessed"by the producer. But in the process of value formation and valorization,the"social form"of nature is manifested as"separation"from the producer due to capitalist private possession,which leads to the alienation of the "exploitation"of itself. On the other hand,from the perspective of promoting the growth of wealth,in the process of labor,the"natural form"of nature manifests itself in a"concrete diversity"of existence to promote the growth of wealth,but in the process of value formation and valorization,the"social form"of nature is expressed as the"value form"of"single abstraction",which leads to its own "devaluation"of alienation.
作者
蔡华杰
Cai Hua-jie(School of Marxism,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou Fujian 350117)
出处
《经济纵横》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第9期1-9,共9页
Economic Review Journal
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“习近平生态文明思想研究”(编号:18ZDA003)
国家社科基金青年项目“新自由主义对全球生态环境治理的影响及我国对策研究”(编号:17CKS030)的成果。
关键词
劳动价值论
自然
存在方式
二重性
劳动二重性
Labor Theory of Value
Nature
Ways of Existence
Duality
Duality of Labor
