摘要
理性与情感的二元对立已由认知科学证伪,但这一二分法至今仍然禁锢法律思维,抑制法律人对情感思维的认知与运用,从而导致或加剧社会的认知撕裂。古今中外的法律实践证明,情感思维是一种必要且重要的法律思维。结合认知科学的研究成果,法律人的情感思维可以有三重含义:一是基于情感做出直觉判断;二是基于情感证成法律判断;三是通过调动情感来进行说服。在价值判断日益多元的现代社会,情感思维的运用对于夯实法律决定的正当性基础、弥合认知裂缝、促进社会认同、强化法律权威有着重要意义。
Cognitive science has disproved the dichotomy of reason and emotion,but this dichotomy still confines legal thinking,deterring lawyers from knowing and using emotional thinking,thus gives rise to or deepen social cognitive break.It shows in legal practices in ancient and modern world,that emotional thinking is a both necessary and important legal thinking.Based on research achievements of cognitive science,lawyers’emotional thinking may have three implications:first,to make intuitive judgements out of emotion;second,to justify legal judgements on basis of emotion;third,to persuade people by mobilizing emotions.In modern society,where there are more and more diverse value judgements,emotional thinking plays a vital role in intensifying legitimate basis of law,patching up cognitive differences,promoting social acceptance and strengthening authority of law.
作者
杨贝
Yang Bei(Law School,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029)
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第11期61-69,158,共10页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
司法部法治建设与法律理论研究项目“判决书中非理性因素的运用与限制”(16SFB3001)课题成果、对外经济贸易大学法学院“双一流人才工程”项目“裁判文书说理规范研究”成果。
关键词
法律思维
情感思维
理性主义
认知科学
legal thinking
emotional thinking
rationalism
cognitive science
