摘要
僧肇在《物不迁论》中对“不迁”的道理进行了详细的阐释,却没有确切说明“物”的内涵与外延,这使得《物不迁论》在脱离作者的写作语境后,于论义上产生了一定的模糊性。从后世的种种注释和论著中可以看出,这种模糊性不仅造成了文意解释上的多样性,也造成了主旨理解上的分歧。从《物不迁论》原文及注疏入手,可以分析“物”这一概念的内涵及其在解释中的张力。
Seng Zhao gave a detailed explanation of the principle of“immutability”in The Immutability of Things,but didn’t exactly explain the connotation and extension of“things”,which made the book The Immutability of Things produce a certain degree of ambiguity in the argument after leaving the author’s writing context.It can be seen from the various notes and works of later generations that this ambiguity not only caused the diversity of the interpretation of the text,but also caused the difference in the understanding of the theme.This paper analyzes the connotation of the concept of“things”and its tension in interpretation from the original text and annotations of the book The Immutability of Things.
作者
姜明佳
JIANG Ming-jia(Department of Philosophy,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
出处
《宝鸡文理学院学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第5期20-24,共5页
Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences：Social Science Edition
关键词
肇论
物不迁论
僧肇
The Corpus of Seng Zhao
The Immutability of Things
Seng Zhao
