期刊文献+

妨害公共交通工具驾驶罪争议厘清与路径完善 被引量:3

To Clarify and Perfect the Way of Dispute on Driving Crime of Disrupting Public Transportation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《刑法修正案(十一)》将妨害公共交通工具驾驶行为单独设罪进行规制,具有响应公众立法呼吁、理顺妨害公共交通工具行为入罪路径、回应风险社会需求的现实意义,为我国治理能力与治理体系现代化提供刑法智慧。然而,现有的妨害公共交通工具驾驶罪的规定存在着乘客妨害行为罪状设置冗长、驾驶人员妨害行为罪状以偏概全、注意规定设置不够恰当的争议。对此,应当理清争议,明确修改方向。具体而言,应在区分“危及”与“危害”差别的前提下,重申乘客妨害行为罪状设置的必要性,重塑驾驶人员妨害行为罪状,删除多余的注意规定,以实现对轻度妨害公共交通工具驾驶行为的准确定性与定刑。 Amendment(Ⅺ) to the Criminal Law sets a separate crime for regulating the driving behavior of obstructing public transportation, which has the practical significance of responding to the appeal of public legislation, rationalizing the criminal path of obstructing public transportation behavior and responding to the demand of risk society, and providing criminal wisdom for the modernization of China’s governance capacity and governance system. However, the existing provisions of the offence of driving against public transport have many controversies, such as the lengthy setting of the offence of passenger’s offence, the overgeneralization of the offence of driving against the driver’s offence, and the inappropriate setting of the regulation of attention. That should clarify dispute, change direction, in particular should be to distinguish the difference between compromise and harm under the premise of reiterated the necessity of passenger counts nuisance Settings, restore drivers nuisance crimes, remove excess attention regulation, to realize the mild to the detriment of the public traffic vehicles driving accurate qualitative and prescribed.
作者 胡雅岚 HU Ya-lan(School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
出处 《时代法学》 2021年第4期51-58,共8页 Presentday Law Science
基金 国家社科基金项目“伦理的刑事司法适用研究”(15XZX016)阶段性成果之一。
关键词 《刑法修正案(十一)》 妨害公共交通工具驾驶罪 立法完善 Amendment(Ⅺ) to Criminal Law driving offence against public transport legislative perfection
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献72

共引文献908

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部