摘要
理论生态学研究面临对野外实验和原假说显著性验证的质疑。前者可通过公众参与异质性研究予以消解;分析了原假说显著性验证后,认为可将后者改为多轮验证,由此保持假说-演绎方法的有效。根据生态学特点和原假说显著性验证要求,进一步修正了普拉特的强推理逻辑步骤并指出生态学进步模式为不同于精致证伪主义与波普尔强证伪主义的第三种证伪主义——弱证伪主义。
Theoretical ecology has to face the challenges of field experiment and null hypothesis significance test(NHST).The solution of the first one is to conduct citizen-participated heterogeneity research,in addition,the solution of the second one,NHST,is to alter the test single-round to multi-rounds,so that to make the methodology of hypothetico-deduction available still.According to the features of ecology and the requiremengt of NHST,we further modify the strong resoning logic from Platt,pointing out that the weak falsification is the third approach of falsificationism which is different with sophisticated falsification and Popperian strong falsificationism.
作者
李际
LI Ji(School of Marxism,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming,Yunnan,650500)
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第10期48-53,共6页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
关键词
假说-演绎
科学说明
原假说显著性验证
Hypothetico-deduction
Scientific explanation
Null hypothesis significance test(NHST)
