摘要
监督执纪坚持纪法情理的贯通融合,是贯彻“惩前毖后、治病救人”原则与落实全面从严治党要求的必然选择。“纪法情理”在监督执纪中不是一种简单的并列关系,而是不同位阶动态融合的范式表达。实践中机械化、碎片化、非体系化理解和适用纪法规范,以及情理概念的模糊化和泛化运用,影响纪法情理贯通融合的实现。为此,纪检监察机关监督执纪要树立积极的纪法情理融合观,以实现依纪依法评价与教育挽救目的的有机衔接。在解释规范时,以“常识、常理、常情”为基础,有效弥合法律精英与社会大众在理解和适用纪法规范上的分歧;在行为评价上,探索纪法处置和裁量时的充分说理机制,推行典型案例指导制度,增加情理内容的确定性、类型性和可预测性。
The integration of discipline,law,sentiment,and reason in the disciplinary supervision is an inevitable choice to implement the principle of“learning from past mistakes to avoid future ones,curing the disease to save the patient”and to implement the requirements of comprehensively governing the Party with strict discipline.“Discipline,law,sentiment and reason”is not a simple juxtaposition in supervision and discipline,but a paradigm expression of dynamic integration of different levels.In practice,the mechanization,fragmentation and non-systematic understanding and application of discipline and law norms,as well as the fuzzy and generalized application of the concept of sentiment and reason,affect the realization of the integration of discipline,law,sentiment and reason.Therefore,the discipline inspection and supervision agencies should establish a positive view.The interpretation of norms should be based on“common sense”in order to effectively bridging the gap between the legal elites and the general public in understanding and applying the disciplinary rules.In behavior evaluation,an adequate reasoning mechanism for disciplinary disposal and discretion should be explored to implement the guidance system of typical precedents so as to improve the the certainty,type and predictability of the content of reason.
作者
熊明明
朱建华
Xiong Mingming;Zhu Jianhua
出处
《河南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第9期44-51,共8页
Henan Social Sciences
基金
云南师范大学2020年党建研究重点课题“监督执纪中纪法情理贯通融合研究”(2020sz12)。
关键词
监督执纪
纪法
情理
贯通融合
Supervision and Discipline Enforcement
Party Regulations and National Laws
Sentiment and Reason
Integration
