摘要
量刑从宽是认罪认罚从宽制度的落点,当前认罪认罚案件存在控辩合意去协商化,法庭审理非实质化以及实体宽宥窄化的三重弊病,严重阻碍量刑从宽的实现。认罪认罚案件的量刑从宽应当推进刑事一体化改革,在量刑合意机制方面应当赋予辩方量刑协商的启动权、规范量刑建议的协商性交涉和开放认罪量刑从宽答辩,在审判程序方面应当确立以量刑为主的庭审结构、规范认罪认罚量刑从宽的法庭调查和允许法院依职权调整明显不当的量刑建议,在实体供给配套方面应当理顺认罪认罚的量刑情节体系,分离认罪认罚与悔罪表现情节并拓宽认罪认罚的量刑从宽幅度。
Lenient sentencing is the keystone of the leniency system of admitting guilt and accepting punishment.The current cases of admitting guilt and accepting punishment have the three disadvantages:such as the ritualization of prosecution defense negotiation,the insubstantialization of court proceedings and narrowing of the lenient sentencing rules,seriously hindering the realization of lenient sentencing in cases of plead guilt and punishments.Cases of admitting guilt and accepting punishment should promote the reform of criminal integration.In terms of sentencing agreement mechanism,the defense should be given the right to initiate sentencing consultations,negotiate for standard sentencing recommendations,and open guilty pledging and sentencing lenient responses.In terms of trial procedures,it is necessary to establish a trial structure focusing on sentencing,standardize court investigations for admitting guilt and accepting punishment,and allow the court to adjust clearly improper sentencing recommendations.The penal system should straighten out the sentencing circumstance system of admitting guilt and accepting punishment,separating the confession of guilt and accepting punishment and repenting circumstance,and expanding the range of lenient sentencing for confessing guilty and accepting punishment.
作者
陈实
CHEN Shi(Law School of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law)
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第5期128-142,195,共16页
The Jurist
基金
教育部2019年人文社会科学研究项目“刑事司法人工智能的规制研究”(19YJA820004)的阶段性成果。
关键词
认罪认罚
量刑从宽
量刑建议
控辩协商
量刑审理
量刑情节
Admitting Guilt and Accepting Punishment
Lenient Sentencing
Sentencing Recommendations
Prosecution Defense Negotiation
Sentencing Trial
Sentencing Factors
