摘要
无论是简单附会环境伦理相关理论论证环境刑法正当性之努力,还是试图仅仅通过传统刑法理论来寻求环境刑法正当性的充分根据之尝试,均存在将环境刑法正当性这一问题过度简单化之倾向。环境伦理和传统刑法理论均为环境刑法之正当性根据。环境犯罪的道德可责难性是环境刑法正当性追问之前提,环境伦理与环境刑法价值追求的内在耦合为环境刑法的正当性提供了可能,环境刑法生态法益观之确立又必然要求环境刑法以环境伦理为其正当性根据。环境刑罚发动的正当性是"因为"之报应与"为了"之预防的辩证统一,在环境刑法语境下,作为威慑的一般预防与作为矫正的特殊预防均具有积极价值,二者均为环境刑罚之目的。
Whether it is the effort to demonstrate the legitimacy of environmental criminal law byapplying the relevant theories of environmental ethics,or the attempt to seek the full basis of the legitimacy of environmental criminal law only in the traditional criminal ethics system,there is a tendency to oversimplify the issue of the legitimacy of environmental criminal law.Both environmental ethics and traditional criminal ethics are the legitimate basis of environmental criminal law.Environmental crime,as a kind of"moral evil",is the premise of questioningthe legitimacy of environmental criminal law.The internal coupling of modern environmental ethics and the value pursuit of environmental criminal law provides the possibility for the legitimacy of environmental criminal law.The establishment of the concept of ecological legal interest of environmental criminal law inevitably requires that environmental criminal law should take environmental ethics as its legitimate basis.The legitimacy of environmental penalty is the dialectical unity of retribution and prevention.In the context of environmental criminal law,both general prevention as deterrence and specialprevention as correction have positive value,both of which are the purpose of environmental penalty.
出处
《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第4期60-68,共9页
Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“我国海洋生态损害的司法救济制度研究”(16YJC820036)。
关键词
环境刑法
正当性根据
环境伦理
传统刑法理论
environmental criminal law
legitimate basis
environmental ethics
traditional criminal ethics
