摘要
以1806份盗窃罪判决书形成的2355个记录为样本,可以得到盗窃罪罚金刑裁量公式的两种形式,即盗窃罪罚金刑的涉案金额公式和自由刑公式。单处罚金刑时,运用涉案金额公式计算罚金刑;并处罚金刑时,运用自由刑公式计算罚金刑。所以,《刑法》第52条应当修改为:判处罚金,应当根据犯罪情节或者自由刑决定罚金数额。在自由刑为0到36个月的2137个记录中,缓刑组的罚金刑均值要显著高于非缓刑组的罚金刑均值,所以在计算基准罚金刑时,缓刑的基准罚金应当高于非缓刑的基准罚金2500元。并且,单处罚金刑组的罚金刑不能超过3万元,缓刑组的罚金刑不能超过6万元,非缓刑组的罚金刑不能超过5万元。
There are 2355 sample records from 1806 convictions for theft.Through linear regression,two forms of Criminal Fine formula for theft are obtained,that is,the "theft amount involved"formula and the"free punishment"formula.When only Criminal Fine is imposed,the fine penalty is calculated by using the"theft amount involved"formula;when free and fine penalty are both imposed,the fine penalty is calculated by using the "free punishment"formula.Therefore,Article 52 of the Criminal Law should be amended to read:to impose a fine,the amount of Criminal Fine shall be determined according to the circumstances of the crime or the free penalty.There are 2137 records from 0 to 36 months free penalty convictions for theft.Through T test,the mean of Criminal Fine in probation group is significantly higher than that in non-probation group.Therefore,the benchmark fine of probation should be 2500 yuan higher than that of non-probation.Moreover,the Criminal Fine of the single fine penalty group cannot exceed 30000 yuan,the fine penalty of the probation group cannot exceed 60000 yuan,and the Criminal Fine of the non-probation group cannot exceed 50000 yuan.
出处
《南大法学》
CSSCI
2021年第4期52-67,共16页
NanJing University Law Journal
关键词
盗窃罪
罚金刑
缓刑
罚金刑裁量公式
Theft Crime
Criminal Fine
Probation
Criminal Fine Formula for Theft
