摘要
在钱穆看来,朱子的心观主要包括"心具众理""心体明觉"和"心统性情"三个方面。其实,此三个方面同时也展现出了钱穆与牟宗三关于朱子心观的分歧,即"心属‘气’还是属‘理’""心能否成为道德本体""心有无道德实践能力"。针对这三个问题,钱穆基于文化和史学立场的诠释,往往不能够与牟宗三道德理想主义的学术立场相一致。他们在思想视域、理论方法和学问旨归等方面都不甚相同,从而形成一种心与心的错位。然而,正是在对这种错位的分析中,我们可以清晰地发现钱穆诠释朱子心观的方法和意义,并为理解朱子心观提供一个新的视角。
In Qian Mu’s Views,Zhu Xi’s Theory of Mind mainly includes three aspects—"principle is originally involved in the mind","ideological awareness",and"mental effects include rationality and sentiment".This actually reflects ideological differences between Qian Mu and Mou Zongsan in terms of Zhu Xi’s Theory of Mind,namely,whether mind is physical or reason-based,whether mind can become moral noumenon,and whether mind has the moral practical ability.Generally,Qian Mu’s interpretation based on culture and history is inconsistent with Mou Zongsan’s academic thought about moral idealism.They had different ideas about the scope of thinking,theoretical method,purpose of knowledge,etc.,which resulted in an ideological inconsistency.However,the analysis for such mismatch reveals that Qian Mu interpreted the method and significance of Zhu Xi’s Theory of Mind and provided a new standpoint to understand it.
出处
《中华文化论坛》
北大核心
2021年第2期19-30,155,共13页
Journal of Chinese Culture
关键词
钱穆
牟宗三
心性
理气
本体
Qian Mu
Mou Zongsan
heart-mind
rationality and sentiment
noumenon
