摘要
囿于诉讼标的的不确定性,确认之诉与给付之诉在司法实践中时常并行存在,形成了非典型的重复起诉。并行诉讼所引发的裁判矛盾在一定程度上会影响裁判公信力和司法权威性。当前的处理方案中,一贯采取的中止审理不符合诉讼效益原则,合并审理则可能存在管辖上的阻碍。为此,在参考域外经验基础上,可以通过完善强制合并审理和中止审理制度的衔接,确立中间确认之诉制度来规范并行诉讼的运行方式。
Due to the uncertainty of the subject matter of the litigation,the litigation of actio confessoria and action of performance often exist concurrently in judicial practice,forming a atypical repeated prosecution.To a certain extent,the contradictions caused by the parallel litigation have affected the credibility of the referee and the authority of the judiciary.In the current treatment plan,it is obviously not consistent with the principle of litigation effectiveness to consistently suspend the trial,and the combined trial may encounter jurisdictional restrictions.Therefore,on the basis of reference to extraterritorial experience,it is possible to standardize the operation of parallel litigation by perfecting the connection between the mandatory merger trial and the suspension of the trial system,and establishing an intermediate confirmation litigation system.
作者
杨峥
Yang Zheng(School of Law,Anhui University,Hefei,Anhui 230000,China)
出处
《黑龙江工业学院学报（综合版）》
2021年第4期81-85,共5页
Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)
基金
国家社科基金“以审判为中心视角下重构侦诉审关系研究”(项目编号:17BFX061)
教育部青年基金“审判中心主义视域下刑事裁判权制约机制研究”(项目编号:15YJC820035)。
关键词
并行诉讼
中间确认之诉
合并审理
牵连管辖
concurrent litigation
intermediate confirmation litigation
combined trial
implicated jurisdiction
