摘要
目的:探究急性脑外伤患者诊断中CT与MRI的应用差异。方法:择选2019年2月~2020年2月本院收治的急性颅脑损伤患者97例为研究对象,所有患者在受伤3d内均接受CT和MRI检查。分别记录两种方法的诊断准确率。并对比两种方法在特殊部位的检出率。结果:MRI检查的诊断准确率为90.72%(88例),而CT检查的诊断准确率仅有76.28%(74例),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。特殊部位检出率方面,两种方法对于硬膜下血肿和硬膜外血肿的诊断,差异不存在统计学意义,P>0.05。CT在蛛网膜下腔出血诊断方面,要比MRI敏感,MRI在脑深部挫伤和脑叶挫裂伤的诊断方面,对CT更为敏感,差异统计学有意义,P<0.05。结论:MRI在急性脑外伤患者的诊断中具有更高的应用价值,CT也是一种重要的诊断方法,临床应用选择应以实际需要为准则。
Objective:To explore the difference in the application of CT and MRI in the diagnosis of acute brain injury patients.Methods:From February 2019 to February 2020,97 patients with acute craniocerebral injury admitted to our hospital were selected as the research objects.All patients underwent CT and MRI examinations within 3 days of injury.Record the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods respectively.And compare the detection rate of the two methods in special parts.Results:The diagnostic accuracy rate of the MRI group was 90.72%(88 cases),while the diagnostic accuracy rate of the CT group was only 76.28%(74 cases),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In terms of the detection rate of special parts,the difference between the two methods for the diagnosis of subdural hematoma and epidural hematoma was not statistically significant,P>0.05.CT is more sensitive than MRI in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage.MRI is more sensitive to CT in the diagnosis of deep brain contusions and lobar contusions.The difference is statistically significant,P<0.05.Conclusion:MRI has higher application value in the diagnosis of patients with acute brain injury.CT is also an important diagnostic method.The choice of clinical application should be based on actual needs.
作者
任红健
REN Hong-jian(Department of Radiology,TEDA Hospital,Tianjin,Tianjin 300451)
出处
《中国医疗器械信息》
2021年第9期71-72,共2页
China Medical Device Information
