摘要
商业秘密的民事侵权和刑事入罪标准历来不明确,导致司法实务中只得求诸唯数额论和证明标准论进行区分,但借助于二次违法理论分析,上述标准均无法反映刑法保护的核心特征。明晰商业秘密的属性是厘清侵犯商业秘密罪法益保护的前提和根本,采用多因素测试法才可以充分保障市场竞争秩序的维护,而重大损失仅作为行为结果成为入罪标准的考虑要素之一。重大损失以客观数额为体现,类型化行为模式下重大损失的计算方式和范围有所不同,对于已经披露进而导致丧失商业使用可能的行为采用以商业秘密价值为主要考虑的标准,而对于未经披露仍具有商业使用可能性的行为结果通常以商业秘密使用价值为核心要素,而此时使用价值的计算方式可以借助于民法规则并予以修正。
The standards of civil infringement and criminal conviction of trade secrets have never been clear,which leads to the distinction between the theory of quantity and the theory of standard of proof in judicial practice,but with the help of the theoretical analysis of the second violation of the law,none of the above standards can reflect the core characteristics of criminal law protection.Clarifying the attributes of business secrets is the premise and foundation for clarifying the legal benefits of the crime of infringing on business secrets.Only the multi-factor test method can fully guarantee the maintenance of the market competition order,and the major loss is only the result of the conduct and it has become one of the criteria for the crime standard.The significant loss is reflected in the objective amount.The calculation method and scope of the significant loss in the typed behavior model are different.For the behavior that has been disclosed and leads to the loss of possible commercial use,the standard of commercial secret value is used as the main consideration.The results of behaviors that still have the possibility of commercial use are usually based on the use value of trade secrets.At this time,the calculation method of use value can be modified by means of civil law rules.
作者
冯晓青
马彪
Feng Xiaoqing;Ma Biao
出处
《法治社会》
2021年第3期34-45,共12页
Law-Based Society
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“创新驱动发展战略下知识产权公共领域问题研究”(项目编号:17ZDA139)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
商业秘密
入罪标准
法益保护
重大损失
商业秘密使用
Trade Secrets
Standards of Incrimination
Legal Interest Protection
Major Losses
Use of Trade Secrets
