期刊文献+

^(18)F-FDG PET/CT与PET/MRI在结直肠癌肝转移诊断中的比较分析 被引量:3

Comparative analysis of^(18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较^(18)F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT与PET/MRI显像对结直肠癌肝转移的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2018年9月至2019年9月于宁波明州医院行全身^(18)F-FDG PET/CT显像及上腹部^(18)F-FDG PET/MRI显像,并疑似有结直肠癌肝转移的27例患者的临床资料,其中男性19例、女性8例,年龄28~78(60.6±12.2)岁。肝内病灶的最终诊断以组织病理学检查或影像学随访结果为参考标准,分别计算2种检查方法诊断结直肠癌肝转移瘤的灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。根据肝转移病灶大小分长径≤1 cm、1 cm<长径≤2 cm、长径>2 cm^(3)组,分别计算各组的2种检查方法的灵敏度。采用McNemar检验比较2种检查方法诊断结直肠癌肝转移瘤的灵敏度、特异度和准确率;采用χ^(2)检验比较2种检查方法诊断结直肠癌肝转移瘤的阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果基于27例结直肠癌患者分析,^(18)F-FDG PET/MRI诊断肝转移瘤的灵敏度、准确率[94%(15/16)、96%(26/27)]均高于PET/CT[81%(13/16)、89%(24/27)],但差异均无统计学意义(McNemar检验,均P>0.05)。基于病灶分析,在27例结直肠癌患者中共发现118个肝内病灶,其中肝转移瘤病灶72个,^(18)F-FDG PET/MRI诊断结直肠癌肝转移瘤病灶的灵敏度、准确率、阴性预测值[85%(61/72)、91%(107/118)、81%(46/57)]均高于PET/CT[63%(45/72)、76%(90/118)、63%(45/72)],且差异均有统计学意义(McNemar检验,χ^(2)=5.072,均P<0.05)。对于长径≤1 cm的肝转移病灶,^(18)F-FDG PET/MRI的诊断灵敏度[63%(17/27)]明显高于PET/CT[7%(2/27)],且差异有统计学意义(McNemar检验,P<0.05)。结论与^(18)F-FDG PET/CT相比,^(18)F-FDG PET/MRI在结直肠癌肝转移中具有更高的诊断价值,尤其是在长径≤1 cm的病灶中。 Objective To compare the diagnostic values of ^(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG)PET/CT and PET/MRI in colorectal cancer liver metastases.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected from 27 patients with suspected colorectal cancer liver metastases,including 19 males and 8 females aged 28–78(60.6±12.2)years old who underwent whole-body ^(18)F-FDG PET/CT and upper abdomen ^(18)F-FDG PET/MRI examination in Ningbo Mingzhou Hospital from September 2018 to September 2019.The result of histopathological examination and imaging follow-up served as the reference standards.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value(PPV)and negative predictive value(NPV)of both methods in the diagnosis of liver metastases were calculated.Liver metastases lesions were divided into three groups according to size:lesion length≤1 cm,1 cm<lesion length≤2 cm,and lesion length>2 cm.The sensitivity of ^(18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in each group were calculated.McNemar test was used to compare the sensitivity,specificity,and accuracy of the two methods in the diagnosis of liver metastases.χ^(2) test was used to compare the PPV and NPV of the two methods in the diagnosis of liver metastases.Results Based on 27 patients with colorectal cancer analysis,the sensitivity and accuracy of ^(18)F-FDG PET/MRI in the diagnosis of liver metastases(94%(15/16)and 96%(26/27))were higher than those of PET/CT(81%(13/16)and 89%(24/27)),but the difference was not statistically significant(McNemar test,both P>0.05).Based on lesion analysis,mong the 118 liver lesions found in the 27 patients,72 lesions were liver metastases and 46 lesions were benign liver lesions.The sensitivity,accuracy,and NPV of ^(18)F-FDG PET/MRI in the diagnosis of liver metastases(85%(61/72),91%(107/118)and 81%(46/57))were significantly higher than those of PET/CT(63%(45/72),76%(90/118)and 63%(45/72);McNemar test,χ^(2)=5.072,all P<0.05).The sensitivity of ^(18)F-FDG PET/MRI(63%(17/27))for lesions with length≤1 cm was significantly higher than that o
作者 于军 张莺 任东栋 陈聪 李洋 任春玲 蔡君 Yu Jun;Zhang Ying;Ren Dongdong;Chen Cong;Li Yang;Ren Chunling;Cai Jun(Department of Nuclear Medicine,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou 310009,China;PET Center,Ningbo Mingzhou Hospital,Ningbo 315100,China)
出处 《国际放射医学核医学杂志》 2021年第2期75-82,共8页 International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 肿瘤转移 氟脱氧葡萄糖F18 正电子发射断层显像术 体层摄影术 X线计算机 磁共振成像 Colorectal neoplasms Liver Neoplasm metastasis Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Positron-emission tomography Tomography,X-ray computed Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1Schima W, Kulinna C, Langenberge r H, et al. Liver metastases of colorectal cancer: US, CT or MR? [J]. Cancer Imaging, 2005,23:149-156. 被引量:1
  • 2Garcia Vicente AM, Dominguez F erreras E, Sdnchez Perez V, et al. Response assessment of colorectal liver metastases with contrast enhanced CT/18F-FDG PET[J]. Eur J of Radiol, 2013, 82: 255-261. 被引量:1
  • 3Rappeport ED, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, et al. Contrastenhanced FDG-PET/CT vs. SPIO enhanced MRI vs. FDG-PET vs. CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation [J]. Acta Radiol, 2007,48: 369-378. 被引量:1
  • 4Lee JW, Kim SK, Lee SM, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases using dual-timepoint FDG PET/CT scans in patients with colorectal cancer [J]. Mol Imaging Bioi, 2011,13: 565- 572. 被引量:1
  • 5Hamm B, Mahfouz AE, Taupitz M, et al. Liver metastases: improved detection with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging? [J]. Radiology, 1997,202:677-682. 被引量:1
  • 6Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF, et al. Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis- Metaanalysisj J]. Radiology, 2005,237: 123-131. 被引量:1
  • 7Ruers TJ, Langenhoff BS, Neeleman N, et al. Value of positron emission tomography with [F-18J fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a prospective study [J]. J Clinical Oncol, 2002,20: 388-395. 被引量:1
  • 8Park JM, Kim IY, Kim SW, et al. A comparative study of FDG PET/CT and enhanced multi-detector CT for detecting liver metastasis according to the size and location [J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2013,27:217-224. 被引量:1
  • 9Dirisamer A, Halpern BS, Schima W, et al. Dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT for the detection of hepatic metastases [J]. Mol Imaging Bioi, 2008, 10: 335-340. 被引量:1
  • 10吴晶涛,王立富,王建平,叶靖,张萍.磁共振弥散成像、非增强磁共振和多排CT对结直肠癌术后肝转移灶检出的对比分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2008,24(12):1621-1623. 被引量:4

共引文献19

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部