摘要
当前我国人民陪审员制度改革的核心是将人民陪审员“法律内行、同职同权”的角色期望纠正为“法律外行、异职异权”,将人民陪审员“消极参与”与“过于积极参与”并存的角色认知纠正为“民主的参与者,事实真相的发现者和社会价值的代言者”,以推动人民陪审员制度充分发挥促进司法民主、司法公正和司法公信的功能。在人民陪审员制度改革基本框架已确立的前提下,应通过完善配套制度建设将改革的基本前提预设转化为正当的司法运作秩序,保证当前人民陪审员制度改革生根发芽。这些制度主要包括两种类型事实领域的人民陪审员知晓争议焦点规范与人民陪审员一事一证规范,意见效力领域的合议庭评议规范和审委会及二审法院复审规范。
To promote judicial democracy,judicial justice and judicial public trust in the people's jury system,the core of the reform of the people's jury system in China is to reverse the role expectation and cognition.The role expectation is reversed from the expert with the same authority as the judge to the layman with diverse authorities.The role cognition is reversed from negative or too active participation to participatory democracy,factual inquiries,and representing social values.As the reform objective is established,realizing these expectations depends on supporting institutions,such as the factual inquiries and the effect of opinion.The people's jurors have the right to know the focus of the dispute.Finding proven fact with the evidences is the responsibility of the people's jurors.Deliberation rule of collegial panel and judicial committee are very important to ensure the effect of the jurors'opinions.Different review norms should be established in the Appeal Court.
作者
陈琳
肖建华
CHEN Lin;XIAO Jian-hua(Law School, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191,China)
出处
《北京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第5期61-72,共12页
Social Sciences of Beijing
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(批准号18BFX070)——“正当当事人制度的理论与实践研究”。
关键词
陪审员
法律外行
法官指示
事实调查
意见效力
juror
layman
judge's instruction
factual inquiries
effect of opinion
