期刊文献+

基于技术风险的方案优化与评估方法的研究

Research on Scheme Optimization and Evaluation Method Based on Technical Risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学地克服方案的性能瓶颈是方案优化的关键.为了科学地突破方案性能瓶颈,提出了一种在充分考虑技术风险的条件下引进技术组合以实现优化及评估方案性能的方法.由于技术本身不成熟所带来的风险会引发不确定性问题,为合理评估技术组合对方案性能优化程度的影响,采用了基于技术成熟度的技术指标影响评估方法,并提出将技术不确定性影响与方案性能指标树相结合的方法来评估多种技术组合对方案性能的优化情况.仿真结果表明,该方法考虑了技术成熟度所带来的风险影响,使评估结果更具科学性、合理性.最后以高速民用运输机型方案评估为例说明了该方法的适用性. The key to scheme optimization is to scientifically overcome the performance bottleneck of the scheme.In order to break through the performance bottleneck of the scientific solution,a method was presented to optimize and evaluate the performance of the scheme by introducing technology combinations while fully considering technical risks.Because the risks brought about by the immaturity of technology itself will cause uncertainty problems.In order to reasonably estimate the impact of technology combination on the degree of performance optimization,an evaluation method of technology index impact based on technology maturity was adopted,and a method was presented to evaluate the optimization results of the scheme performance caused by various technology combinations by using a combination of technology uncertainty impact and scheme performance index tree.Simulation results show that,this method,taking into account the risk and impact caused by technology maturity,makes the evaluation result more scientific and reasonable.Finally,an example of evaluating the high-speed civil transportation model was given to illustrate the applicability of this method.
作者 谭博文 段枫 王文广 TAN Bowen;DUAN Feng;WANG Wenguang(School of Computer Science,Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Beijing 100876,China;The First Military Representative Office,Military Representative Bureau of the Ministry of EquipmentDevelopment in Beijing,Beijing 100015,China;Beijing Zhifang Technology Company,Beijing 100088,China)
出处 《北京理工大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第4期425-431,共7页 Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology
关键词 方案优化 技术组合 技术成熟度 方案评估 scheme optimization technology combination technology maturity scheme evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1王璇,陈寿标.对综合管沟规划设计中若干问题的思考[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(4):523-527. 被引量:61
  • 2Paul K D, Russell D S,Justin B. Portfolio-Analysis Methods for Assessing Capability Options [R]. U. S.A. :RAND Corporation, 2008, MG-662. 被引量:1
  • 3Paul D, Paul K D. A Portfolio-Analysis Tool for Missile Defense [ R ]. U. S. A... RAND Corporation, 2005, TR-262-A. 被引量:1
  • 4Edwin J E,Martin J G, Stephen J B,et al. Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis [M]. U. S.A. :John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , 2007. 被引量:1
  • 5Jack A J, Brian L J, Lee J L. an Operational Analysis for Air Force 2025, An Application of Value-Focused Thinking to Future Air and Space Capabilities[M]. U.S.A.: Air University, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 6Don S, Patrick M, Adam C R, et al. Assessing capabilities and risks in air force programming [R]. Pittsburgh: RAND Corporation, 2009. 被引量:1
  • 7MORS Workshop. Capabilities based planning: the road ahead [R]. Institute for Defense Analysis Arlington, Virginia, Oct. , 2004. 被引量:1
  • 8Yi Y. A holistie view of UK military capability development [J]. Defense & Security Analysis, 2009, 25 (1) :53 - 67. 被引量:1
  • 9Elena I N, Miachael H, Yi Y. The influence of the concept of capability-based management on the development of the systems engineering discipline[J]. 7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research 2009, Loughborough University , UK, 2009:34 - 41. 被引量:1
  • 10Cheryl M S, Jeff L. Portfolio influences on air force capabilities-based assessment and capabilities-based planning activities [C]//Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 2011:83 -89. 被引量:1

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部