摘要
通常认为,面临提质需求的国际制度理应优先进行内部建设,而非向外拓展。然而,对上海合作组织首轮扩员实践的经验观察发现:尽管其内部存在制度建设问题,国际组织仍然完成了扩员并持续运行。为什么提质需求更为迫切的制度会做出扩员选择?在跨区域研究视角下,成员国的异质性背景、决策机制的协商一致原则和外部制度的功能竞争,使上海合作组织面临一种在短期内难以改变的结构性低效。而借由扩员可以纳入替代资源、扩展合作路径,强化跨区域制度在国际、区域和国家个体层面的影响,对制度收益予以补偿。这种在结构性低效背景下以“多层次功能补偿”为核心的扩员现象,在上海合作组织扩员案例中得到了证实。
It is often assumed that international institutions facing the need for quality improvement should prioritize internal development rather than outward expansion.However,an empirical observation of the first round of SCO expansion reveals that despite problems in its internal institution-building,it has completed its expansion and continued to operate.Why did the system with more pressing need for quality improvement make the choice of expansion?From the perspective of cross-regional study,the SCO faces a structural inefficiency that is difficult to get over in the short term because of the heterogeneous nature of the member states, the consensus principle of the decision-making mechanism and thefunctional competition of the external system. The expansion of membership can compensatefor the institutional gains by incorporating alternative resources, expanding the path ofcooperation, and strengthening the impact of the cross-regional system at the international,regional, and individual national levels. Membership expansion in the context of structuralinefficiency, with “multi-level functional compensation” as the core, is confirmed in the caseof SCO expansion.
作者
彭昕
Peng Xin(Candidate of China Foreign Affairs University)
出处
《区域与全球发展》
2021年第2期34-49,155,156,共18页
Area Studies and Global Development
关键词
低效制度
扩员实践
功能补偿
上海合作组织
inefficient institution
membership expansion
functional compensation
SCO