期刊文献+

新型大国协调模式下提升中国全球金融治理能力的思考——基于G20与G7的比较视角 被引量:1

On the Improvement of China’s Global Financial Governance Capability under the New Model of Power Coordination——Based on the Comparison between G20 and G7
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在经济全球化放缓背景下,国际货币政策协调如今面临多重现实挑战,各国金融政策外溢效应亦在显著增强。作为西方大国"俱乐部",七国集团(G7)在全球金融治理中的地位依然稳固,但伴随二十国集团(G20)成为国际经济合作首要平台,新型大国协调模式下的全球共治将是大势所趋。文章从国际货币政策协调视角出发,比较分析G7与G20在全球金融治理中的协调效应,解读二者的互动模式和矛盾根源,阐述二者在中美摩擦全面升级条件下的现实诉求与动力机制,为准确评估G7与G20的全球共治立场、推动国际货币体系改革进程、提升新兴经济体全球多边治理国际话语权,以及中国有效制定G20战略提供可行性论证提供参考。 Under the background of economic globalization slowdown,international monetary policy coordination is now facing multiplerealistic challenges,and the spillover effect of financial policies in various countries is also significantly enhanced.As a"club"of Western powers,the G7’s position in global financial governance remains stable.However,with the G20 becoming the primary platform for international economic cooperation,global governance under the new model of great power coordination will be the general trend.From the perspective of international monetary policy coordination,this paper compares and analyzes the coordination effects of G7 and G20 in global financial governance,interprets their interaction mode and root causes of contradictions,and expounds their realistic appeals and dynamic mechanism under the condition of overall escalation of Sino-US friction,so as to accurately evaluate the global governance position of G7 and G20,promote the reform process of international monetary system,and enhance the global multilateral competitiveness of emerging economies.This research also provides a feasible demonstration reference for China to effectively formulate its G20 strategy.
作者 徐凡 陈晶 XU Fan;CHEN Jing(University of International Business and Economics;Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation)
出处 《国际贸易》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期89-96,共8页 Intertrade
基金 国家社科基金一般项目“新型大国协调视阈下G20与G7比较研究”(16BGJ019)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 国际货币政策协调 七国集团 二十国集团 利益诉求 international monetary policy coordination G7 G20 interest appeals
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献61

  • 1国际货币基金组织.《世界经济展望》,2010年4月版,http://www.imf.org/extemal/pubs/ft/weo/2010/01/pdf/tables.pdf. 被引量:3
  • 2Barry Carin, Paul Heinbecker, Gordon Smith, Ramesh Thakur," Making the G20 Summit Process Work: Some Proposals for Im- proving Effectiveness and Legitimacy", CIGI G20 Papers, No. 2, June 2010, p. 2. 被引量:1
  • 3Stewart Patrick, "The G20 and the United States: Opportuni- ties for More Effective Multilateralism", A Century Foundation Report, December 28, 2010, pp. 24-29. 被引量:1
  • 4Leonardo Martinez-Diaz, "The G20 "after Eight Years : How Ef- fective a Vehicle for Developing Country Influence?" Global Economy and Development Working Paper, No. 12, The Brookings Institution, October 2007, p. 17. 被引量:1
  • 5Agnes Benassy-Quere, Rajiv Kumar, and Jean Pisan-Ferry, "The G20 Is Not Just A G7 with Extra Chairs", BRUEGEL Policy Con- tribution, ISSUE 2009/10, September 2009, pp. 2-8 ; Kirton, John and Madeline Koch, eds. , G8 & G20: The 2010 Canadian Summits, Lon- don: Newsdesk, 2010, pp. 306-307. 被引量:1
  • 6李增伟.《中国梦体现战略眼光》,《人民日报》,2013年11月15日. 被引量:1
  • 7Angeloni,I. ,J. Pisani-Ferry. The G20: characters in search of an author. Working Paper,2012/04, Bruegel,2012. 被引量:1
  • 8Asmussen, J.. Introductory statement for the panel discussion on the G20 and the future of global economic governance. IIF Annual Mem- bership Meeting, Washington DC,2013. 被引量:1
  • 9Benassy -Qurrr, A. , R. Kumar, J. Pisani-Ferry. The G20 is not just a G7 with extra chairs. Policy Contribution 2009/10, Brnege1,2009. 被引量:1
  • 10Bertoldi, M. , H. Sherrer,G. Stanoeva. The G20@5: is it still delivering? ECFIN Economic Brief, 2013,27. 被引量:1

共引文献35

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部