摘要
受案范围是行政诉讼的基本问题,单纯依靠立法修改的方法已经不能满足实践中对受案范围的新需求,指导性案例的出现弥补了立法滞后的缺陷。22号、69号和77号指导性案例分别确立了内部行政行为、程序性行政行为和告知性举报答复行为的可诉标准,畅通了行政相对人寻求司法救济的途径。实证研究证明了指导性案例在行政诉讼受案范围方面发挥了指导效果的结论。探求三个指导性案例背后的逻辑可以发现,对公民、法人权利义务产生实际影响是其隐藏条件,这一隐藏标准应是未来行政诉讼受案范围研究的重点和改革的方向。
The scope of case acceptance is the basic issue of administrative litigation.Simply relying on legislative amendments can no longer meet the new requirements for the scope of case acceptance in practice.The emergence of guiding cases has made up for the lagging legislative defect.Guiding Cases No.22,No.69 and No.77 respectively established the litigable standards for internal administrative actions,procedural administrative actions and informative reporting and replies,and smoothed the channels for administrative counterparts to seek judicial relief.The empirical research proves that the guiding case has played a guiding effect in the scope of case acceptance in administrative litigation.Exploring the logic behind the three guiding cases,we can find that the actual impact on the rights and obligations of citizens and legal persons is its hidden condition.This hidden standard should be the focus of future research and the direction of reform on the scope of case acceptance in administrative litigation.
作者
杨思影
Yang Siying(Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210046,China)
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2021年第1期75-83,共9页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词
指导性案例
行政诉讼
受案范围
guiding cases
administrative litigation
scope of case acceptance
