期刊文献+

间充质干细胞与透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎治疗效果及安全性对比的Meta分析 被引量:5

Effectiveness and safety of mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid for treating knee osteoarthritis: a Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价关节腔内注射间充质干细胞(MSCs)与透明质酸治疗膝OA的有效性及安全性。方法系统检索PubMed、Embase、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库、中国生物医学数据库(CBM)等数据库,搜集筛选出关于关节腔内注射MSCs对比透明质酸治疗膝OA的临床随机对照试验(RCT),检索时间从建库至2020年5月,按照入选和排除标准对文献进行筛查、提取信息及评价偏倚风险后采用RevMan 5.3软件行Meta分析。结果最终纳入文献13篇,共726例膝关节OA患者。Meta分析结果可见:对比透明质酸组,MSCs组治疗后,西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数总评分(WOMAC)明显下降[MD=-10.92,95%CI(-16.87,-4.96),P<0.01],视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分显著下降[MD=-1.70,95%CI(-2.44,-0.95),P<0.01],膝关节Lequesne指数评分显著降低[MD=-13.78,95%CI(-15.03,-12.52),P<0.01],2组不良事件(AEs)发生率比较差异无统计学意义[RR=1.11,95%CI(0.90,1.37),P=0.33]。美国膝关节协会评分(AKS)评分[MD=-10.15,95%CI(-22.33,2.03),P=0.10]及磁共振评分体系(WORMS)评分[MD=-3.93,95%CI(-11.60,3.75),P=0.32]分析结果差异无统计学意义,提示关节腔内注射MSCs可显著改善膝OA患者关节疼痛和功能障碍,而不良事件的发生率在MSCs组与透明质酸组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论MSCs治疗膝OA后,患者关节症状及功能明显改善、生存质量得到提高,同时具有较好的安全性,有望成为膝OA改善临床症状及预后的新型治疗方法。 Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular in-jection of mesenchymal stem cells(MSCs)and hyaluronic acid(HA)in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.Methods The relevant literatures published in both English and Chinese were systematically searched in PubMed,Embase,Wanfang database,China Knowledge Network(CNKI),SinoMed database and other data-bases from inception to May 2020.Two researchers independently extracted data and evaluated the included literature.Risk assessment of literature bias was carried out.RevMan 5.3 software was used for Meta analysis,and the combined sensitivity were calculated.Results Finally,13 references were included,including a total of 726 patients with knee osteoarthritis.Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the HA group,the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteopathic Index Total Score(WOMAC)[MD=-10.92,95%CI(-16.87,-4.96),P<0.01],the visual analogue scale(VAS)score[MD=-1.70,95%CI(-2.44,-0.95),P<0.01],and the knee joint Lequesne index score of MSCs group all decreased significantly[MD=-13.78,95%CI(-15.03,-12.52),P<0.01].Furthermore,there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events(AEs)between the two groups[RR=1.11,95%CI(0.90,1.37),P=0.33].However,American Knee Association Score(AKS score)[MD=-10.15,95%CI(-22.33,2.03),P=0.10]and whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score(WORMS)[MD=-3.93,95%CI(-11.60,3.75),P=0.32]were not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with intra-articular injection of HA,intra-articular injection of MSCs can significantly improve the symptoms and dysfunction,and has favorable clinical tolerability and safety,suggesting that MSCs is expected to bea new treatment for knee osteoarthritis.
作者 李欠欠 王苏丽 邢飞 吕良敬 Li Qianqian;Wang Suli;Xing Fei;Lyu Liangjing(Department of Rheumatology,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200001,China;Department of Orthopedics,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《中华风湿病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第1期15-25,共11页 Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
基金 国家重点研究发展计划(2017YFC0909002) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81974251) 上海申康新兴前沿技术联合攻关项目(SHDC12018106) 上海市中西医临床协作试点项目建设(ZY(2018-2020)-FWTX-1009)。
关键词 间充质干细胞 透明质酸 骨关节炎 META分析 随机对照试验 Mesenchymal stem cells Hyaluronic acid Osteoarthritis Meta analysis Randomized controlled trials
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献73

  • 1Woodforde JM,Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain[J].{H}Journal of Psychosomatic Research,1972,(03):173-178. 被引量:1
  • 2Jensen MP,Chen C,Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores:a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain[J].{H}Journal of Pain,2003,(07):407-414. 被引量:1
  • 3Gallagher E J,Liebman M,Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):633-638. 被引量:1
  • 4Gallagher E J,Bijur PE,Latimer C. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2002,(04):287-290. 被引量:1
  • 5Fosnocht DE,Chapman CR,Swanson ER. Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2005,(01):55-59. 被引量:1
  • 6Grilo RM,Treves R,Preux PM. Clinically relevant VAS pain score change in patients with acute rheumatic conditions[J].{H}Joint Bone Spine:Revue du Rhumatisme,2007,(04):358-361. 被引量:1
  • 7Bird SB,Dickson EW. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):639-643. 被引量:1
  • 8Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain[J].{H}EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL,2001,(03):205-207. 被引量:1
  • 9Emshoff R,Emshoff I,Bertram S. Estimation of clinically important change for visual analog scales measuring chronic temporomandibular disorder pain[J].{H}Journal of Orofacial Pain,2010,(03):262-269. 被引量:1
  • 10Emshoff R,Bertram S,Emshoff I. Clinically important difference thresholds of the visual analog scale:a conceptual model for identifying meaningful intraindividual changes for pain intensity[J].{H}PAIN,2011,(10):2277-2282. 被引量:1

共引文献832

同被引文献58

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部