摘要
从叙事隐喻的角度看,《老子》叙事隐喻仅以现实生活作为始源域,《庄子》中的叙事隐喻都为著者虚构的隐喻,即"歪曲现实"隐喻和"歪曲历史"隐喻。《庄子》在叙事人物和叙事结构方面对《老子》似有模仿的倾向,但又进行了创新和发展,不同于《老子》,从而可见《老子》对《庄子》的影响。究其原因,《庄子》在先秦学术语境之下,有可能学习和模仿其他各种接触到的先秦典籍,在自身所形成的哲学体系下融会贯通,最终创造出在先秦诸子中独树一帜的表达方式。
From the point of view of narrative metaphor,it can be seen that the narrative metaphors in Laozi only originated from life,while the ones in Zhuangzi are all fictional metaphors of the author,i.e."metaphors of distorted reality"vs."metaphors of distorted history".It seems that Zhuangzi has a tendency to imitate Laozi in narrative characters and structure but it is different from Laozi in innovation and development,which indicates that Laozi has some influences on Zhuangzi.Under the academic context of the preQin period,Zhuangzi is likely to have learned and imitated other pre-Qin classics,and finally created a unique way of expression among the pre-Qin scholars through its own philosophical system.
作者
熊浩莉
XIONG Hao-li(College of Liberal Arts,Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331,China)
出处
《长江师范学院学报》
2020年第6期8-15,121,共9页
Journal of Yangtze Normal University
基金
重庆市社会科学规划项目“认知视域下先秦诸子政治语篇的隐喻学研究”(2018BS26)。
关键词
《庄子》
《老子》
叙事隐喻
Zhuangzi
Laozi
narrative
narrative metaphor
