期刊文献+

经腹膜后入路腹腔镜手术治疗大体积肾癌的临床效果评价 被引量:1

Clinical Effect Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery through Retroperitoneal Approach in the Treatment of Large-volume Renal Cell Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究经腹膜后入路腹腔镜手术治疗大体积肾癌的临床效果。方法方便选择2013年1月—2018年12月该院收治的158例大体积肾癌患者进行研究,均接受腹腔镜根治术治疗,根据其手术入路不同分为两组,其中,对照组(n=81)经腹腔入路施术,观察组(n=77)经腹膜后入路施术,比较两组治疗总有效率、手术情况、术后并发症发生率、手术前后机体炎症反应变化及随访情况。结果观察组治疗总有效率93.51%,与对照组的93.83%相比,差异无统计学意义(χ^2=0.000,P=1.000)。观察组患者手术时间、术后首次肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、术后引流管留置时间和住院时间均显著短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者术中出血量、术后总引流量均较对照组明显减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症总发生率5.19%,对照组为8.64%,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前,两组WBC计数、CRP、IL-6检测值比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后,两组上述3项炎症指标均较术前明显升高,但观察组较对照组明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经腹膜后入路腹腔镜手术治疗大体积肾癌具有疗效好、创伤少、引流量少、术后恢复快等优势,而且对机体炎症反应影响较少,更有利于缩短患者康复进程,值得推广应用。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of retroperitoneal approach through laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of large-volume renal cell carcinoma.Methods 158 patients with large-volume renal cell carcinoma admitted to the hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 were selected for the study.They all received laparoscopic radical resection.They were divided into two groups according to their different surgical approaches.Among them,the control group(n=81)was performed transperitoneal approach,and the observation group(n=77)was performed retroperitoneal approach.The operation conditions,postoperative complications,changes in body inflammation before and after the operation and follow-up were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 93.51%,compared with 93.83%in the control group,the difference was not statistically significant(χ^2=0.000,P=1.000).The operation time,the first postoperative anus exhaust time,the time to get out of bed,the postoperative drainage tube indwelling time and the hospital stay in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative total drainage in the observation group were significantly reduced compared with the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 5.19%,and that of the control group was 8.64%.There was no statistically significant difference between the groups(P>0.05).Before operation,the WBC count,CRP and IL-6 detection values of the two groups were not statistically different(P>0.05).After the operation,the above three inflammatory indexes in the two groups were significantly higher than those before the operation,but the observation group was significantly reduced compared with the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic surge
作者 郑怀颖 卢庆 林益山 周凯 陈剑晖 谢若云 江玮 ZHENG Huai-ying;LU Qing;LIN Yi-shan;ZHOU Kai;CHEN Jian-hui;XIE Ruo-yun;JIANG Wei(Department of Urology,Union Hospital,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou,Fujian Province,350001 China)
出处 《中外医疗》 2020年第33期81-84,共4页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 大体积肾癌 腹腔镜手术 经腹膜后入路 Large-volume renal cell carcinoma Laparoscopic surgery Retroperitoneal approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献79

  • 1祝宇,吴瑜璇,芮文斌,周文龙,刘定益,张羽中宇,邵远,孙福康.囊性肾细胞癌微创治疗时代一些值得重视的问题[J].中国医师杂志,2004,6(11):1453-1454. 被引量:5
  • 2师梅,李荣山.缺血预处理对肾脏缺血再灌注损伤保护作用的研究进展[J].国外医学(移植与血液净化分册),2005,3(6):37-41. 被引量:3
  • 3石珊,刘绍玲,李吉昌,栾晓萍.囊性肾癌的超声与CT诊断及鉴别诊断[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2007,5(4):250-252. 被引量:5
  • 4Scosyrev E, Messing EM, Sylvester R, et al. Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904 [J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65 : 372- 377. DOI : 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2013.06. 044. 被引量:1
  • 5Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass[ J]. J Urol, 2009, 182 : 1271-1279. DOI: 10. 1016/i. iuro. 2009.07. 004. 被引量:1
  • 6Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy : a multicenter study [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66:542-549. DOI: 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2014.04. 028. 被引量:1
  • 7Patel M, Porter J. Robotic retroperitoneal surgery : a contemporary review[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2013, 23:51-56. DOI: 10. 1097/ MOU. 0b013e32835b61f4. 被引量:1
  • 8Wahafu W, Ma X, Li HZ, et al. Evolving renorrhaphy technique for retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon series[J]. Int J Urol, 2014, 21:865-873. DOI: 10. llll/iju. 12470. 被引量:1
  • 9Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [ J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67 : 891-901. DOI : 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2014.12. 028. 被引量:1
  • 10Marszalek M, Chromecki T, A1-Ali BM, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy : a matched-pair comparison of thetransperitoneal ~ersus the retroperitoneal approach [ J ]. Urology, 2011,77 : 109-113. DOI : 10. 1016/j. urology. 2010.02. 057. 被引量:1

共引文献60

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部