摘要
作为中国协商民主体系的重要组成部分,基层协商民主在实践中的发展困境备受关注。作为治理创新,基层协商民主发展出了制度性、平台性和技术性三种类型。每种基层协商民主所依赖的创新机制、产生的创新效应以及塑造出的创新特征存在差异,导致不同协商经历了不同的创新调适,进而形成了困境分化。困境分化反映出治理创新中的内卷化逻辑对于不同协商具有差异化的解释力,这种差异的形成可能与基层协商民主的特殊性有关。基层协商民主的制度化需要在关注困境分化和特殊性的基础上有机供给制度环境支持、社会认同和技术合理三个要素。
As an important part of Chinese deliberative democracy,the development dilemma of Grassroots Deliberative Democracy(GDD)has received much attention.As governance innovation,GDD has developed three types,including institutional deliberation,platform deliberation and technical deliberation.The three types of GDD have differences in innovation mechanism,the innovation effect and the innovation characteristics,which lead to GDD undergoing different innovation adjustments,and eventually lead to the dilemma differentiation.Dilemma differentiation reflects that the involute logic in governance innovation has differentiated explanatory power for different deliberation,and the difference may be related to the particularity of GDD.On the basis of paying attention to the dilemma differentiation and particularity of GDD,the institutionalization of GDD needs to organically provide the three elements of institutional environmental support,social identity and technological rationality.
出处
《社会主义研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期126-133,共8页
Socialism Studies
基金
2020年度上海市人民政府决策咨询课题“人民城市背景下居民参与城市基层治理的渠道优化研究”(2020-W-05)。
关键词
基层治理
协商民主
治理创新
制度变迁
Grassroots Governance
Deliberative Democracy
Governance Innovation
Institutional Change
