摘要
认罪认罚从宽制度实施以来,在提高诉讼效率方面效果显著,但同时也伴随着架空程序正义的风险,律师实质性参与是认罪认罚从宽程序之正当性基础。加之认罪认罚从宽制度推动着协商性司法的进程,中国特色的控辩协商机制来日可期,律师的有效参与更应成为完善制度构建的应有之义。然而司法实践的现状与制度设计的初衷相去甚远,律师分别在侦查、审查起诉、审判各诉讼阶段发挥不同作用的同时也面临不同的参与困境。结合域外经验加以审视,认罪认罚从宽制度框架下的律师参与存在辩护理念和立法规制的双重缺失。具体而言,应推动有效辩护的理念建构和精细值班律师的制度建构,探寻律师实质性参与认罪认罚从宽程序的合理路径,从而有效保障被追诉人的诉讼权利,助力认罪认罚从宽制度的健康推进。
Since the implementation of the System of Pleading Guilt and Accepting Punishment with Leniency(hereinafter“SPGAPL”),it has achieved remarkable effect in improving the efficiency of litigation,but at the same time,it is accompanied with the risk of ignoring procedural justice.The substantive participation of lawyers is the legitimate basis of the SPGAPL.In addition,the SPGAPL promotes the process of consultative criminal justice,therefore,the negotiation mechanism between prosecution and defense with Chinese characteristics can be expected in the future,and the effective participation of lawyers should be the due meaning of perfecting the system.However,the current situation of judicial practice is far from the original intention of the system design.Lawyers play different roles in the investigation,review and prosecution,trial,and they also face different participation difficulties.Based on the overseas experience,the lawyer s participation under the framework of the SPGAPL has dual defects of defense concept and legislative regulation.Specifically,we should promote the construction of the concept of effective defense and the system construction of on-duty lawyer,and explore the reasonable path of lawyers substantive participation in the SPGAPL,so as to effectively protect the litigation rights of the accused and help the healthy promotion of the SPGAPL.
作者
陈卫东
安娜
CHEN Weidong;AN Na(Law School,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100082,China)
出处
《浙江工商大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期71-85,共15页
Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“以对质为中心的刑事法庭调查规程研究”(20BFX093)
中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目成果“认罪认罚从宽制度实施中的律师的地位与作用研究”(20XNH016)。
关键词
认罪认罚从宽
控辩协商
值班律师
有效辩护
三个诉讼阶段
pleading guilt and accepting punishment with leniency
negotiation between prosecution and defense
on-duty lawyer
effective defense
three litigation stages
