摘要
20世纪中后期以来,人文学科反思西方史学理论的成果表明,现代“理论”概念与其古典含义之间存在连续性。历史学家对于历史的理论和实践活动统摄于“观看”范畴。作为一种对历史本体的整体性“观察”,“历史理论”不仅注重认知维度,而且强调伦理和审美维度。在史学研究中,“狭义的史学理论”是对历史知识内在本质的“观看”,既是认识论也是方法论。作为一种对知识前提或假设的分析和批判,“狭义的史学理论”有利于“历史理论”的合理化和明晰化,但也可能导致后者人文魅力的削减。对于史学实践来说,“狭义的史学理论”在一定意义上是根本性和构成性的。历史研究应是经验性范畴和超越性范畴相统一的活动。构建一种令人信服的中国史学学科体系、学术体系和话语体系,还需要加强“史学理论”的开拓与创新。
Since the mid-to-late 20th century,humanistic reflections on Western historiography have shown a continuity between the modern concept of“theory”and its classical meaning.Historians’theoretical and practical historiographical activities are united under the category of“observing”As an integral observation of historical ontology,“historical theory”emphasizes not only the cognitive dimension but also the ethical and aesthetic dimension.In historical research,“historical theory in the narrow sense”is an observation of the intrinsic nature of historical knowledge as both epistemology and methodology.As a form of analysis and a critique of knowledge premises or hypotheses,this theory is conducive to the rationalization and clarification of historical theory,but may also lessen its humanistic attraction.In a sense,historical theory in the narrow sense is fundamental and structural for the practice of historical research.Historical research should unite the categories of experience and transcendence.To build the convincing discipline system,academic system and discourse system of Chinese historiography,we also need to strengthen the development and innovation of historical theory.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第11期22-42,204,205,共23页
Social Sciences in China
