摘要
分权制衡作为西方立宪主义理论的核心,在被借以解读中国政治传统中的监察权原理时从逻辑上往往难以贯通融洽。这一困境不断刺激着中国传统监察权研究在理论范式和方法论上的积极探索。围绕中国的监察权传统,钱穆在历史政治学视野中对监察权的基本原理及其宪制精神展开了系统新诠,更是结合孙中山五权宪法的监察权思想形成了传统宪制精神赓续转进的变革思路,构成了我们理解钱穆的中国传统政治理论及历史政治学研究方法的重要范例。
As the core of the Western theory of constitutionalism,the separation of powers and checks and balances are often difficult to clarify logically when they are used to interpret the principle of supervisory power in the Chinese political tradition.This dilemma continues to stimulate the active exploration of the theoretical paradigm and methodology in the research on traditional Chinese supervisory power.Focusing on China’s tradition of supervisory power,Qian Mu has launched a systematic new interpretation of the basic principles of supervisory power and its constitutional spirit from the perspective of historical politics,and has combined with Sun Yatsen’s five-power constitutional supervisory power thought to form a continuation of the traditional constitutional spirit.The thoughts of change that have been transformed constitute an important example of our understanding of Qian Mu’s traditional Chinese political theory and historical political science research methods.
出处
《政治思想史》
CSSCI
2020年第4期38-54,197,198,共19页
Journal of the History of Political Thought
关键词
监察权
分权制衡
大一统宪制
五权宪法
supervisory power
separation of powers and checks and balances
unified constitutional system
five-power constitution
