摘要
在百来年的先秦逻辑史研究中,《左传》一直没有受到足够的重视。由于《左传》不是一部讨论逻辑理论的著述,因而出现这种研究情况有其合理性。不过,这也影响到对先秦逻辑史的整体认识。在广义逻辑视野下,《左传》中丰富的论辩实践材料具有重要的逻辑史料价值。对于《左传》论辩实践的研究,不仅可以揭示春秋时人的论辩方法或策略(如论辩时对受众需求及其品质特征的考虑),而且有助于理解先秦诸子辩学和先秦论辩实践的总体情况。
In more than a hundred years’study on the history of pre-Qin logic,Zuo Zhuan has not been given due importance.Such a situation is reasonable when we take into consideration the fact that Zuo Zhuan is not a book dedicated to discussing logical theories.Despite this,the lack has erected a barrier to a complete comprehension of the history of pre-Qin logic.From the viewpoint of generalized logic,the abundant argumentative practices recorded in Zuo Zhuan have an important historical value for logic.The study of the argumentative practices in Zuo Zhuan can not only reveal the methods or strategies of argumentation in the Spring and Autumn period,such as the consideration of audience’s needs and characters during the argumentation,but also contribute to a fuller understanding of the thought of argumentation and argumentative practices in pre-Qin times.
出处
《学术研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第11期29-34,177,共7页
Academic Research
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“基于广义逻辑的春秋政治论辩研究”(16CZX053)的阶段性成果。
