期刊文献+

自然主义视野中的逻辑必然性

Logical Necessity in the View of Naturalism
原文传递
导出
摘要 从自然主义的视角出发,科学知识社会学的早期代表人物布鲁尔把逻辑知识等同于集体共享的推理模式,探求逻辑知识的自然与社会基础。在他看来演绎推理是建立在人类生物性基础上的一种社会惯例,逻辑必然性是一种道德必然性,逻辑的强制力来自于社会。逻辑规则作为社会惯例,是自我指涉、自我创造、自我证立的。 In his book Knowledge and Social Imagery,Dr David Bloor proposed a 'strong programme' for the sociology of knowledge including scientific,mathematic,and logical knowledge.Contrary to the standard view which states that knowledge is justified true belief,Bloor takes the view of naturalism.From this viewpoint,he takes logical knowledge as the shared inference patterns,and inquires its natural and social basis.For him,logical inference is a social phenomenon,based on the human biological make-up;Logical necessity is a species of moral obligation.The compelling force of logic comes from society.As a social institution,logical rule can be analyzed in terms of collective processes having a self-referring character.According to this self-referring model,logical rule exists in the practical using,has no independent source of justification.Any justification for the logical necessity must trace back to the practice itself.In a word,it is self-referring,self-creating and self-validating.
作者 臧艳雨
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期23-28,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 自然主义 逻辑必然性 社会惯例 naturalism logical necessity social institution
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Bloor D. Knowledge and Social ImageryEM3. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1991/1976. 被引量:1
  • 2Bloor D. What can the Sociologist of Knowledge Say about 2 +2=4? [A] In Ernest P (eds). Mathematics, Education and Philosophy[C]. London: Falmer, 1994, Chapter 2. 被引量:1
  • 3Barnes B, Bloor D and Henry J. Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis [M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 4Bloor D. Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge[M]. London: Macmillan, 1983. 被引量:1
  • 5Barnes B, Bloor D. Relativism, Rationality and the Sociology of Knowledge-AJ. In Hollis M and Lukes S (eds). Rationality and Relativism[C], Oxford : Blackwell, 1982:21- 47. 被引量:1
  • 6Bloor D. Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions [M]. Routledge, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 7Prior A. The Runabout Inference Ticket. Analysis [J] ,vol. 21,1960:38-39. 被引量:1
  • 8Haack S. The Justification of Deduction. Mind[J], 85 (337) ,1976:112-119. 被引量:1
  • 9Ylikoski P. Ylikoski Reviews " Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis". Science, Technology & Human Values [J]. Cambridge.. Summer, 1998:349-351. 被引量:1
  • 10Hagstrom. Hagstrom Reviews"Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis ". Contemporary Sociology[J]. Washington.. Jul 1997, Volume26, Issue4, 518 - 519. 被引量:1

二级参考文献46

  • 1任平,欧阳康,冯平,鞠实儿.当代哲学研究的前沿问题(续):马克思“反思的问题视域”及其当代意义[J].中国社会科学,2006(6):35-40. 被引量:57
  • 2Plato, Theaetetus, translated with notes by John McDowell, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. 被引量:1
  • 3Witt~enstein, Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001, pp. 68, 43. 被引量:1
  • 4肖尔兹.《简明逻辑史》,张家龙、吴可译,北京:商务印书馆,1977年,第6-25页. 被引量:2
  • 5J. A. Mortimer, "Logic, " in Great Books of the Western World, Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1990, pp. 798-810. 被引量:1
  • 6Susan Haack, Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1996, pp. 26-35. 被引量:1
  • 7托马斯·许兰德·埃里克森.《小地方,大论题一--社会文化人类学导论》,董薇译,北京:商务印书馆,2008年,第10页. 被引量:1
  • 8舍尔巴次基.《佛教逻辑》,宋力道等译,北京:商务印书馆,1997年,第1-2、365-368页. 被引量:1
  • 9亚里士多德.《工具论》,余纪元译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003年. 被引量:2
  • 10Michael A Gilbert, Coalescent Argumentation, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997. 被引量:1

共引文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部