期刊文献+

认罪认罚从宽制度中程序性从宽研究 被引量:7

A Study of Procedural Leniency in the Leniency System of Confession and Punishment
原文传递
导出
摘要 认罪认罚从宽制度中的"从宽"兼具实体性与程序性。程序性从宽作为制度"从宽"的下位概念,应当遵循"从宽"的一般逻辑,以满足形式、实质以及保障条件为要求。形式条件指从宽以认罪认罚为前提,实质条件指从宽应当兼具从宽性与确定性,而保障条件指从宽不得成为压迫认罪认罚自愿性的工具。程序性从宽的内容以强制措施与停止追诉从宽为界,但不包含简化审理程序审理。分析理论中的分歧,强制措施从宽具有理论上的正当性,纳入参考因素的从宽方式符合"从宽"的实质条件,程序性从宽并不绝对成为压迫认罪认罚自愿性的工具。程序性从宽在实践中总体运行不畅,需在形式、实质、保障三条件的理论框架下进行原因分析并提出相应对策建议。 "Leniency"in the leniency system of confession and punishment has both substantive and procedural nature.The content of procedural leniency is bounded by compulsory measures and stop prosecution leniency,but does not include the simplification of trial procedure.As a subordinate concept of"Leniency",procedural leniency should follow the general logic of"Leniency",and meet the requirements of form,substance and guarantee conditions.The formal condition refers to leniency,which is based on confession and punishment,while the substantive condition refers to both leniency and certainty,while the safeguard condition refers to that leniency should not be used as a tool to suppress the voluntary confession and punishment.At present,the theoretical study of procedural leniency in China is lack of systematization,and the overall operation is not smooth in practice.Therefore,it is necessary to analyze the causes under the theoretical framework of form,substance and guarantee,and put forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions.
作者 唐海东 TANG Hai-dong(Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,C hina)
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第11期170-183,共14页 Hebei Law Science
基金 最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题《认罪认罚被告人反悔权研究》(GJ2019C30)。
关键词 认罪认罚 程序性从宽 逮捕 不起诉 自愿性审查 plead guilty procedural leniency arrest non prosecution voluntary review
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献179

共引文献558

同被引文献107

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部