摘要
PPP模式是“交易成本公共物品理论”在实践中的典型运用,是公共服务领域行之有效的公私合作新形式,但长期以来存在的对PPP协议之法律性质及解纷模式的争议与误读严重影响了制度实效。对此,应当紧扣PPP模式的制度要义,准确把握政府在PPP模式中具有的“合作者”与“监管者”之双重角色,在此基础上,将PPP协议的法律性质界定为“民行混合合同”,并进一步推导出“行政+民事+行政附带民事诉讼”这一相对适宜的PPP协议解纷模式。
PPP model is a typical application of“transaction cost public goods theory”in practice,and it is a new form of effective public-private cooperation in the field of public services.However,the long-standing disputes and misunderstandings related to the legal nature of the PPP agreement and the dispute resolution model have seriously affected the effectiveness of the system.In this regard,it is necessary to closely follow the essentials of the PPP model and accurately grasp the dual roles of the“cooperator”and“regulator”of the government in the PPP model.On this basis,the legal nature of the PPP agreement is defined as a“civil-bank mixed contract”,and a relatively suitable PPP agreement resolution model of“administrative+civil+administrative incidental civil litigation”is further derived.
作者
张娜
ZHANG Na(Faculty of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430000,China)
出处
《中州大学学报》
2020年第5期43-47,共5页
Journal of Zhongzhou University
关键词
PPP
交易成本公共物品理论
行政附带民事诉讼
PPP
transaction cost public goods theory
administrative incidental civil litigation
