摘要
律师调解的制度化发展是近年来我国多元化纠纷解决机制改革的一大亮点,受到了自上而下的积极推广。该制度事实上以社会公益性和司法辅助性为主进行整体构建和运作,并非官方所宣称的具备"兼顾公益性与市场化"的定位。而公益性的律师调解活动在实践活动中既缺乏来自律师的参与热情,又缺乏来自"客户"的认可,既无法脱离现有调解框架的约束形成独立的调解力量,又存在制度伦理性建构的缺陷。根据我国现有的调解格局运作状态、律师的职业属性以及制度设立的基本目的来看,以市场化进行定位的律师调解制度可能更具有实践意义。市场化律师调解活动能够充分激发律师的参与积极性、提高客户的认可程度以及弥补制度伦理性的不足,更重要的是,它能够真正激发律师调解制度本身的价值,促进我国调解格局的良性变革。
The institutional development of lawyer mediation is a major highlight of the reform of China’s alternative dispute resolution mechanism in recent years,and has been actively experiences the top-down promotion.In fact,the system is based on social public welfare and judicial assistance,and it is not conform to the officially declaration that the the lawyer mediation system have the position of"conserving commonweal and marketization".In the practice activities,public welfare lawyermediation activities lack the enthusiasm for participation from lawyers and the lack of recognition from"customers".They can neither form an independent mediation force from the constraints of the existing mediation framework,and have ethical construction defects.According to the existing operational status of the mediation pattern,the professional attributes of lawyers and the basic purpose of the establishment of the system,the lawyer mediation system based on marketization may be more practical.Market-oriented lawyer mediation activities can fully stimulate the enthusiasm of lawyers to participate,improve the recognition of customers and make up for the ethical deficiencies of the system.More importantly,it can really stimulate the value of the lawyers’mediation system and promote the benign changes of China’s mediation pattern.
作者
纪琼
JI Qiong(Law School,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第10期165-188,共24页
Hebei Law Science
基金
2017年度教育部课题《政府与公民新型法治关系的构建》(17YJA820044)。
关键词
律师调解
多元化纠纷解决机制
制度定位
公益性
市场化
lawyer mediation
alternative dispute resolution
institutional orientation
public welfare
marketization
