摘要
梁启超的“新史学”与顾颉刚领导的“古史辨运动”之间有着较为密切的学术关联。在“古史辨运动”兴起之际,顾颉刚受梁启超《中国史叙论》《新史学》《历史上中国民族之观察》《中国地理大势论》等文启发,先是建构“层累说”,后又提出“打破民族出于一元的观念”与“打破地域向来一统的观念”两项推翻“非信史”的标准。“古史辨运动”进一步发展后,对“孔子与儒家”的问题进行了重点探讨,其中无论是顾颉刚对孔子真相的考察,还是冯友兰对孔子地位的估定,均可上溯到梁启超的《保教非所以尊孔论》《孔子》等相关论著。此后,“古史辨运动”转向“古书辨”,无论是胡适提出的“诸子不出于王官论”,还是罗根泽对诸子兴起原因的阐述,都或多或少地从梁启超《论中国学术思想变迁之大势》中汲取了相应的学术资源。因此,梁启超的“新史学”在“古史辨运动”的历程中扮演了一个学术启蒙的角色。
There is a close connection between Liang Qichao's proposal for“new historiography”and the Gushibian(debate on ancient historiography)Movement.At the beginning of the movement,Gu Jiegang was inspired by Liang Qichao's articles,such as A Narrative Introduction to Chinese History,New Historiography,Observation of Chinese Nation in History and Treatise on the Trends in Chinese Geography.He established the“accumulation theory”on ancient Chinese history,and then proposed“to challenge the belief that the Chinese nation was of one single origin”and“to challenge the belief that the Chinese territory was always of one unitary whole.”With the development of the movement,“Confucius and Confucianism”became one of the most important topics.Both the investigation of the authenticity of Confucius by Gu Jiegang and the re-evaluation of Confucius by Feng Youlan can be traced back to Liang's works such as Protecting Confucianism as a Religion Is Not Showing Respect for Confucius and Confucius.After that,the focus of the movement turned to examining the authenticity of ancient books.Liang Qichao furthermore had impact on Hu Shi who argued that“classical schools of philosophy did not originate in officialdom”and Luo Genze who investigated the origins of these various schools through his The Trend of Changes in Chinese Academic Thought.Therefore,the new historiography advocated by Liang Qichao played a significant role in the Gushibian Movement.
出处
《史学理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期87-97,159,共12页
Historiography Bimonthly
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“中外交汇:‘古史辨运动’的学术渊源研究”(项目编号:18JHQ052)的阶段性成果。
