摘要
《民法典》第528条第3句修正了《合同法》第59条第3句的规定,通过"视为以自己的行为表示不履行主要义务",引入了合同解除权和承担违约责任请求权,创设了一个新的预期违约类型,即预期不能履行。这样,我国预期违约制度体系展现为:预期拒绝履行(明示预期违约、默示预期违约)、预期不能履行,两大类三种类型。由第528条第3句创设的预期不能履行,因系嫁接于不安抗辩之上,辐射面较窄,有待通过解释论进一步拓宽。同时,合理期限内未提供适当担保且未恢复履行能力的,均认定构成违约,缺乏归责基础的支持。
The third sentence of Article 528 of the Civil Code amends the third sentence of Article 59 of the Contract Law to introduce the right to rescind the contract and the right to request for responsibility for breach of contract by"considering that one’s own behavior indicates non-performance of the main obligation",created a new type of expected default,that is,the expected failure to fulfill.In this way,the system of anticipatory breach in our country shows three types:anticipatory refusal to perform(explicit repudiation,implicit repudiation),prospective nonperformance.The expectation created by the third sentence of Article 528 cannot be fulfilled because it is grafted on the uneasy defense and the radiation surface is relatively narrow,which needs to be further broadened through the theory of interpretation.At the same time,failure to provide appropriate guarantees within a reasonable period of time and failure to restore performance capacity are deemed to constitute a breach of contract and lack support for a foundation of liability.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期132-139,共8页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金项目(18BFX117)“侵权法所保护范围的确定模式研究”。
关键词
中止履行
不安抗辩
预期违约
defense of insecurity
withhold performance
anticipatory breach
