期刊文献+

权力感对道德决策的影响及其机制:基于群体层面的研究 被引量:2

The Effect of Sense of Power on Moral Decision-Making and Its Mechanism:A Group-Level-Based Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究采用道德两难困境,以大学生为被试,考察了在群体层面上权力感对道德决策的影响及其机制。研究发现:(1)不同群体情境中高、低权力感个体的道德决策倾向不同。在内群体情境下,高权力感被试的道德决策倾向得分显著高于低权力感被试,表现出功利主义倾向;而在外群体情境下,两者并无显著差异。(2)在内群体情境中,责任感知在权力感对道德决策倾向的影响中起中介作用。本研究的结果促进了对权力可以维护群体利益、促进群体发展这一积极意义的理解。 Adopting the moral dilemma and with college students as subjects,this study explored the effect of sense of power on moral decision-making at the group level and its mechanism.The results showed that:1) moral decision-making of individuals with different levels of power varied in different group contexts.In the in-group context,the score of moral decision tendency of the subjects with high sense of power was significantly higher than that of the subjects with low sense of power,showing a utilitarian tendency.However,no significant difference was found in the out-group context;2) in the in-group context,the perception of responsibility played a mediating role in the effect of the sense of power on moral decision-making.The results of this study are conducive to understanding the significance of power in safeguarding group interests and promoting group development.
作者 杜秀莲 王红霞 DU Xiulian;WANG Hongxia(School of Foreign Languages,Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan,250014;School of Psychology,Shandong Normal University,Jinan,250014)
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第8期81-87,共7页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
关键词 权力感 道德决策 责任感知 内群体 外群体 sense of power moral decision perceived responsibility in-group out-group
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献82

  • 1Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper. 被引量:1
  • 2Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality". Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-91. 被引量:1
  • 3Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536. 被引量:1
  • 4Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2005). The subjective sense of power: Structure and antecedents. Unpublished manuscript. University of California at Berkeley. 被引量:1
  • 5Arendt, H. (1961). Between Past and Future. New York: The Viking Press. 被引量:1
  • 6Benjamin, A. J. (2006). The relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and attitudes toward violence: Further validation of the attitudes toward violence scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 923-926. 被引量:1
  • 7Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to principles of morals and legislation (J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart, Eds.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 被引量:1
  • 8Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187. 被引量:1
  • 9Crowson, H. M., Thoma, S. J., & Hestevold, N. (2005). Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism? The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 571-592. 被引量:1
  • 10Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466. 被引量:1

共引文献47

同被引文献17

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部