摘要
海牙《承认与执行外国民商事判决公约》第4条第(2)款确立了不对外国判决实质性问题进行审查的一般原则,即非实质审查原则。但出于适用公约必要时可以考虑实质审查,从而在涉及公约其他条款适用时出现对原审判决实质审查的情形。对此,应对判决实质审查进行狭义理解,且仅限定在公约框架下。在国内立法和实践方面,不同国家虽以形式审查为主要原则,但也会在一定条件下涉及对判决的实质审查,但在具体事项和范围上有所不同。我国目前双边条约的规定和实践基本上与公约不存在冲突,但仍须完善外国判决承认和执行方面的法律规范。
Art. 4(2) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters("Judgment Convention") lays down the principle of no review of the merits of judgments. However, this article also regulates exception for this principle for the necessary application of the Judgment Convention, which may cause the review of merits of judgments when the other provisions of the Convention are applied. In this regard, the review of the merits of judgments should be understood in a narrow sense and only limited to the framework of the Convention. In terms of domestic legislation and practice, although different countries take no review of merits as the main principle, they will also involve review of merits of judgments under certain conditions, but differ in specific matters and scope. China’s bilateral treaties and practices basically do not conflict with the principle of Convention, but it still needs to improve the legal regulations in recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.
出处
《中国应用法学》
2020年第4期78-95,共18页
China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
关键词
外国判决的承认和执行
实质审查
形式审查
海牙判决公约
recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments
review of merits
no review of merits
the Judgment Convention
