期刊文献+

护士心理韧性量表的编制及其信效度检验 被引量:18

Development and Psychometric Testing of the Resilience Scale for Nurses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制护士心理韧性量表,并对其进行信效度检验。方法采用文献回顾和专家咨询法,构建护士心理韧性量表。2019年8-11月,便利抽样法选取广州市某3所三级甲等医院的226名临床护士,对其采用护士心理韧性量表进行调查,并检验护士心理韧性量表的信效度。结果最终形成的护士心理韧性量表共包含3个维度,即护理工作环境、个体内部韧性和韧性重组,共23个条目。该量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.928,内容效度为0.974,折半信度为0.858,重测信度为0.866。结论护士心理韧性量表具有良好的信效度,适用于我国护士心理韧性水平的测量。 Objective To develop the resilience scale of nurses,and to test its reliability and validity.Methods The resilience scale of nurses was constructed by literature review and expert consultation.From August to November 2019,a questionnaire survey was conducted among 226 nurses from three hospitals in Guangzhou to test the reliability and validity of the Resilience Scale.Results The final resilience scale of nurses included three dimensions,including nursing working environment,individual internal resilience and resilient reintegration,with a total of 23 items.The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.928, the content validity was 0.974, the half reliability was 0.858, and the retest reliability was 0.866.Conclusions The resilience scale of nurses has good reliability and validity,which can be used to measure the resilience of nurses in China.
作者 林思婷 罗梦娜 李泽楷 LIN Siting;LUO Mengna;LI Zekai(School of Nursing,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,Guang-dong Province,China;Department of Colorectal,Sun Yat-sen University of Cancer Center,Guangzhou 510060,Guangdong Province,China)
出处 《解放军护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第8期44-47,共4页 Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词 护士 心理韧性 量表 信度 效度 nurse resilience scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1刘亚男,崔丽霞.心理弹性评估的现状和未来[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2009(S4):167-171. 被引量:10
  • 2刘取芝,吴远.压弹:关于个体逆境适应机制的新探索[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2005,4(2):111-115. 被引量:56
  • 3阳毅,欧阳娜.国外关于复原力的研究综述[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(5):539-541. 被引量:67
  • 4Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518. 被引量:1
  • 5Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135. 被引量:1
  • 6Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575. 被引量:1
  • 7Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22. 被引量:1
  • 8Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293. 被引量:1
  • 9Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385. 被引量:1
  • 10Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197. 被引量:1

共引文献1122

同被引文献198

引证文献18

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部