期刊文献+

SBAR交班模式在骨科交班中的运用效果研究

Research on the Effect of Applying SBAR Transfer Mode in Orthopedic Handover
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 分析SBAR交班模式在骨科交班中的运用效果.方法 选取我院骨科104例住院患者为研究对象,按照入院顺序分为观察组、对照组,观察组实施SBAR交班模式,对照组实施常规交班模式,对比两组交接班质量、护士体验综合评分及交接班各类不良因素.结果 观察组交接班质量评分、护士体验综合评分均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组特殊检查漏做、护理遗漏项目及交接问题不清/错误等交接班不良因素发生率低于对照组(P<0.05).结论 SBAR交班模式在骨科交班中的运用效果显著,可提高骨科交接班质量,降低不良事件发生率. Objective To analyze the effect of SBAR shift mode in orthopedic shifts.Metho ds From June 2016 to May 2018,we selected 104 inpatients from our department of orthopedics as the study subjerts,and were divided into the observation group and the control group according to the admission order.The observation group implemented the SBAR shift mode,and the control group implemented the routine shift mode.The quality of the shifts in the two groups,the comprehensive scores of the nurses'experience,and various adverse factors in the shifts.Resu I ts The observation group quality grade and the nurse experience comprehensive score of the observation group were higher than the control group.The data were statistically significant(P<0.05);the observation group did not perform special inspections,missed rare items,and unclear/error handover issues.The incidence of adverse factors was lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistirally significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of SBAR shift mode in orthopedic shifts has a significant effect,which ran improve the quality of orthopedic shifts and reduce the inc idence of adverse events.
出处 《首都食品与医药》 2020年第15期133-135,共3页 Capital Food Medicine
关键词 SBAR交班模式 骨科 交接班质量 不良因素 SBAR shift mode orthopedics quality of relay classes adverse factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献54

  • 1耿笑微,万巧琴,刘宇,尚少梅,罗萍,金晓燕,王志稳,范晓君,张岩,周宇彤.护理学及其相关护理理论的应用现状及影响因素的调查与分析[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(3):277-280. 被引量:37
  • 2欧少青,郑淑华,张婉君,谢宛美,曾妙玉.品质圈活动在提高供应室管理质量中的作用[J].护理学报,2006,13(5):87-88. 被引量:32
  • 3刘庭芳.中国医院品管圈操作手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:1. 被引量:173
  • 4Beckett CD, Kipnts6. Collaborative communication: integrating SBAR to improve quality/patient safety outcomes. J Hezlthc Qual, 2009, 31(5):19-28. 被引量:1
  • 5Duckitt RW, Buxton-Thomas R, Walker J, et al. Worthing physiological scoring system: derivation and validation of a physiological early-warning system for medical Admission. An obser-vational,population-based sing leeentre study [J]. Br J Anaesth,2007,98(6) :769-774. 被引量:1
  • 6Adams JM, Osborne-McKenzie T. Advancing the evidence base for a standardized provider handover structure: using staff nurse descriptions of information needed to deliver competent care[J]. J Contin Educ Nurs,2012,43(6) ;261-266. 被引量:1
  • 7Zimmer mann PG. Cutting-edge discussiorns of management, policy and program issues in emergency care[J]. J Emerg Nuts,2006,32(3),267-273. 被引量:1
  • 8SBAR technique for communication: a situational briefing model [EB/OL]. [2010-05-19]. http://www, ihi. org/IHI/Topics/Pa- tient Safety/ Safety General/Tools. 被引量:1
  • 9Thomaz VA,Guirardello EB.Sistematizacao de assistencia de enfermagem:problems identificados pelos enfermeiros[J]. Rev Nursing, 2002,5 (54) : 28-33. 被引量:1
  • 10史雪峰,玄英哲.护理理论、护理实践、护理研究的关系[J].中国实用医药,2008,3(5):126-127. 被引量:13

共引文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部