摘要
This empirical legal study focuses on the application of the principle of reliance in medical malpractice in China.Given the differences in background,knowledge,and experience,during the interactions between the application of medical laws and clinical practice,legal and health professionals can have different practical ideas and perspectives regarding the medical division of labor and supervision as well as the application of the principle of reliance.Therefore,an empirical legal study is necessary to gain insights into this issue through the objective analysis of statistics as well as the analysis of the related legal literature and judicial decisions.The results of a survey conducted in China show that most participants had relatively high tolerance toward a medical negligent offender.Nevertheless,Chinese legal professionals must accept the application of the principle of reliance in medical malpractice.Through the survey and objective analysis of statistics,the author found that although the judicial and medical groups encounter the same problems,they have very different perspectives and attitudes.
在医事法律运用与临床医疗实践的相互影响过程中,基于职业立场、知识背景、实践经验等因素的不同,对于医疗分工、医事监督、组织信赖原则适用等问题,法律专业工作者与医疗专业工作者可能持有彼此各异的实务观点与实践认识。除了对相关法学文献以及司法判决案例等进行理论分析与研究外,有必要通过法律实证分析方法进一步加以研究。这是中国法学理论界首次在全国范围内对相关专业人员进行问卷调查。从所提示的数据来看,司法实务对同一行为是否担责以及担责程度持谨慎态度。通过此次问卷调查及统计分析,更加深刻地阐明了目前中国司法实务界与医学界对于同一问题处理依据不同立论基础所采用的不同思维、方法、态度,及其原因。
作者
Liu Yueting
刘跃挺(Northwest University of Political Science and Law)
